Pressure vessel Design - Splay out concern

AI Thread Summary
The pressure vessel design under discussion involves an end cap bolted to the body, which does not comply with any pressure vessel code. The designer is attempting to qualify it to the PD5500 code but faces challenges due to derated allowables, necessitating a change to a threaded lock ring due to space constraints. Concerns have been raised about the potential splay out of the lock ring during pressure testing, with basic FEA indicating localized high stresses despite a low deflection of 0.2mm. The materials used include a body rated at 65 ksi and both the lock ring and end cap at 80 ksi. The discussion also touches on the attachment of the vessel's bottom, questioning if it is pressure rated or requires design consideration.
krithika
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Dear Members,
The existing design for the pressure vessel is an end cap bolted to the body which is not designed to any pressure vessel code. Currently I'm trying to qualify this pressure vessel to PD5500 code. Due to the derated allowables in the code i couldn't go with the bolted arrangement, In order to qualify the existing design i have to triple the number of bolts for which i don't have space.

Not left with much options i decided to go with end cap and threaded lock ring ( Please see attachement-BLOGS). The threads i use in the lock ring is stub acme. Although the thread length and lock ring tensile area are good for 300bar ejection load(internal pressure) as per my calculation, I'm more concerned about the splay out of the lock ring. I did some basic FEA from which the deflection i got was 0.2mm but the stresses are localised and quite high. I'm not sure if i can go ahead with the testing with this fine safety factor margin.

Temperature is 20 deg C, but I am not overly concerned about this at this stage.

Material
Body - 65 ksi
Lock ring - 80ksi
End cap - 80ksi.
 

Attachments

  • BLOGS.PNG
    BLOGS.PNG
    64.1 KB · Views: 345
  • 2D Axisymmetric FEA.docx
    2D Axisymmetric FEA.docx
    184.9 KB · Views: 335
Engineering news on Phys.org
So, what is your question ?
 
My question is will the lock ring splay out during pressure testing? Please let me know if you need any additional info.
 
I have no knowledge of this stuff, but I'm still interested in one aspect of the problem. Your drawing makes it appear as if the bottom of the vessel is also attached via a collar rather than being formed-in. If so, is it already pressure rated or are you designing that too?
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top