Probability of a particle in a box in the first excited state.

AI Thread Summary
To find the probability of a particle in the first excited state within a box of length L, the probability is calculated using the wave function ψ normalized to the box dimensions. The integration of the probability density function over the small interval ∆x = 0.007L from 0.543L to 0.557L yields a result of approximately 1.32%. However, due to the small size of ∆x, it is suggested that integration may not be necessary, and the area can be approximated directly. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing that dx can be treated as Δx for small intervals, simplifying the calculation. Understanding this approximation can clarify the confusion surrounding the integration process.
kickingpaper
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle is in the first excited state of a box of length L. Find the probability of finding the particle in the interval ∆x = 0.007L at x = 0.55L.

Homework Equations


P = ∫ ψ*ψdx from .543L to .557L


The Attempt at a Solution


Normalizing ψ gives ψ=√(2/L)sin(nπx/L)
P = ∫ ψ*ψdx = ∫(2/L)sin^2(nπx/L)dx from .543L to .557L
The integration simplifies to
P = x/L - sin(4πx/L)/4
so P = [.557L/L - sin(4π*.557L/L)/4] - [.543L/L - sin(4π*.543L/L)/4]
P = 0.0132 or 1.32%

This is wrong though and the hint given afterwords was that because the Δx is so small, there is no need for integration. This just confuses me because abs(ψ)^2 will have a 1/L factor in it. Any help will be useful. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, ok, think of how you would approximate the area under a small section of a graph. (What is the simplest shape you can use?) And your 'graph' is abs(ψ)^2 against x, with Δx= 0.007L
 
Thanks

Thanks for reminding me that dx can be approximated as Δx. For some reason I didn't make that jump
 
hehe yeah, that's alright. It is quite unusual to do an 'approximate integral' in this way. You could maybe even calculate the fractional error (to first order), by calculating the derivative of abs(ψ)^2, and finding the difference that this makes to the approximation.

(but that's not part of the question, so whatever).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top