Proving Hamiltonian Invariance with Goldstein Problems

Irid
Messages
207
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I'm solving Goldstein's problems. I have proved by direct substitution that Lagrange equations of motion are not effected by gauge transformation of the Lagrangian:

L' = L + \frac{dF(q_i,t)}{dt}

Now I'm trying to prove that Hamilton equations of motion are not affected by this type of transformation.

Homework Equations


Hamiltonian:

H = \dot{q}_i p_i - L


Total time derivative:

\frac{dF(q_i,t)}{dt} = \frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} \dot{q_i} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial t}

Canonical momentum:

p_i = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_i}

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the definition of canonical momentum we immediately see that the new canonical momentum is

p_i' = \frac{\partial L'}{\partial \dot{q}_i} = p_i + \frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}

But wait a moment! If the canonical momentum is altered, isn't the motion going to be effected? I'm missing something here... Anyway, we go on further to show that the new Hamiltonian is

H' = \dot{q}_i p_i' - L' = H - \frac{\partial F(q_i, t)}{\partial t}

It satisfies one of Hamilton's equations of motion

\dot{q}_i' = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_i} = \dot{q}_i

but fails for the second one,

\dot{p}_i' = -\frac{\partial H}{\partial q_i} = \dot{p}_i + \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial q_i \partial t}

Now I'm a little lost... I don't know how to prove the invariance, and the most disturbing part is that the canonical momentum is clearly not invariant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But wait a moment! If the canonical momentum is altered, isn't the motion going to be effected? I'm missing something here...

Well, the Euler-Lagrange equation is what gives you the equation of motion, and that is invariant on adding the total derivative. So, the motion shouldn't be affected, right?

Also, for the last couple of steps, shouldn't you find

\frac{\partial H}{\partial {p_i'}}

as the canonical momentum is defined by the new lagrangian?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top