Pushing a cylinder along a surface with friction.

AI Thread Summary
When pushing a cylinder along a frictional surface, it does not instantly achieve pure rolling motion; instead, it begins with translational motion and may transition to rolling without slipping depending on the applied force. If the push force exceeds the static friction threshold, the cylinder will roll with slipping before potentially transitioning to rolling without slipping as it accelerates. The dynamics of this motion are influenced by the coefficients of static and dynamic friction, which determine the angular acceleration and reaction forces acting on the cylinder. Additionally, the center of mass velocity (vcm) of a rolling cylinder differs between slipping and non-slipping states, complicating direct comparisons. Understanding the forces at play is crucial for analyzing the kinetic energy and work done by friction during this process.
WookieKx
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If I push a cylinder along a surface with friction then am I right in saying that it would almost instantly start a pure rolling motion with a combination of translational and rotational kinetic energy?
Or would it start initially with pure translational motion and gradually accelerate rotationally to a pure rolling motion over time?

I am stuggling to prove with equations either way could someone help with this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

The cylinder cannot instantly acquire a roll velocity, if that is what you are asking.

Depending on how much horizontal force you apply to the cylinder it will either begin to roll without slipping (if the force is low enough, see below) or it will begin to roll with slipping and then only later (assuming a constant push force) go back to roll without slipping when the cylinder rolls fast enough for the surface of it to "keep up" with the ground.

Usually one models the difference between the two types of roll (non-slipping and slipping) using static and dynamic coefficient of friction. Only if the magnitude of your initial push exceeds the magnitude of the normal force times the static coefficient of friction you would have rolling with slipping and the reaction force (which determines how much angular acceleration the cylinder gets) then equals the magnitude of the normal force times the coefficient of dynamic friction. If the cylinder rolls without slipping the magnitude of the reaction force is equal to the magnitude of the normal force times the coefficient of static friction. Since the coefficient of static friction is larger than the coefficient of dynamic friction you would get the highest angular acceleration when the cylinder rolls without slipping.

Also note, that a perfectly round cylinder on a perfectly flat surface is not physical possible since it distributes its normal force from the surface over an area of size zero. A physical cylinder will of course have non-zero contact area with the surface, but depending on how smooth the surfaces are the size of the contact area can vary as the cylinder rolls giving rise to variations in a practical experiment that you would not see if you slide a flat block over a surface.
 
Thanks for the welcome.

I was trying to understand it in terms of kinetic energy and work done by the friction as it rolls.
Using the forces on the cylinder instead makes more sense.

Also, a slightly related question.

Would the vcm of a rolling cylinder with slipping be the same as the vcm of a rolling cylinder without slipping?
Or would the vcm be higher when rolling without slipping?
 
This problem is very similar to a pool cue hitting a billiard ball. If the cue hits the billiard ball at its center, the ball will initially slide. If the cue hits the ball at a sweet spot above the center of gravity, it will transfer both a linear momentum impulse and a rotational momentum impulse, hence no slipping.

See discussion of sweet spot in http://www.real-world-physics-problems.com/physics-of billiards.html . Scroll down to Physics Of Billiards — The Sweet Spot
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WookieKx said:
Would the vcm of a rolling cylinder with slipping be the same as the vcm of a rolling cylinder without slipping?
Or would the vcm be higher when rolling without slipping?

Well, it is difficult to give a direct answer on that because you need to have some difference in the two situations so that the cylinders end up slipping and non-slipping respectively, and since such difference will influence the acceleration it may not make sense to compare the velocities directly in those two situations.

By the way, I can see that I've made a blunder in my previous post that may have you confused. I said that in the case of rolling without slipping the reaction force is equal to the normal force times the coefficient of static friction. This is not correct. What I should have said was that the reaction force have a maximum at that point. As long as the push force is less that this maximum the reaction force will be equal to the push force. If you look at a block instead of a cylinder, this means that the sum of the push force and the reaction force is zero and the block doesn't accelerate as will be expected. For the cylinder to accelerate when it is not slipping then fully comes from the rolling of the cylinder, that is, the torque on the cylinder from the reaction force will induce an angular acceleration on the cylinder which then lead to the cylinder start rolling.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top