Quantum Tunneling of a conduction electron in Copper

Philolaus_
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A conduction electron moves through a block of Cu until it reaches the surface. At the surface the electron feels a strong force exerted by the nonuniform charge distribution in that region. This force tends to attract the electron back into the metal which is what causes the conduction electron to remain bound to the metal. Given that the work function of the metal is 4 eV estimate the distance x that the electron can penetrate outside of the Cu block.

Homework Equations


Wave function = Ψ(x) = De^(-kx)
Probability of tunneling = P = |Ψ(x)^2
Wave number k = sqrt(2m(V-E))/ħ

The Attempt at a Solution


I am confident on how the penetration depth is calculated as it can be calculated using the following steps;

Compare probability at x=0 and x = Δx where Δx is the point where the probability of finding a particle is 1/e of its original value.
This gives;
1/e * |Ψ(0)|^2 = |Ψ(Δx)|^2
D^2e^(-2k*0) * 1/e = D^2e^(-2k(Δx))
1/e = e^(-2k(Δx))
-1 = -2k(Δx)
Δx = 1/2k
Δx = ħ/(2sqrt(2m(V-E)))

We know the potential is 4eV from the question, but I don't know how the energy of the electron, E, is obtained and any help on where the value for E would be appreciated..

Thank you in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: what does the work function tell you?
(Not the depth of the potential well.)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top