Quantum Zeno Effect and Evolution Operator Properties

Markus Kahn
Messages
110
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


Let ##U_t = e^{-iHt/\hbar}## be the evolution operator associated with the Hamiltonian ##H##, and let ##P=\vert\phi\rangle\langle \phi\vert## be the projector on some normalized state vector ##\vert \phi\rangle##.

Show that
$$\underbrace{PU_{t/n}P\dots PU_{t/n}}_{n\text{ times}}P = \langle \phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle ^n P$$
and that
$$\langle\phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle ^n = e^{-i\langle H\rangle t/\hbar}(1+\mathcal{O}(t^2/n))$$

Homework Equations


All given above.

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first eq. I wrote out
$$\begin{align*}\langle \phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle^n &= \langle \phi\vert U_{t/n}\underbrace{\vert\phi\rangle \langle\phi\vert}_{=P} U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle \dots \langle \phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle\\
&= \langle \phi\vert U_{t/n} \underbrace{P\dots PU_{t/n}}_{n-1\text{ times}}\vert\phi\rangle .\end{align*}$$
I'm not sure how this is supposed to add up since the last ket in the last eq. is just not there in the expression that we want.

For the second equation we can expand
$$U_{t/n} = e^{-iHt/n\hbar} = 1 -\frac{it}{n\hbar} H+ \mathcal{O}(t^2/n^2).$$
The problem arises when I try to calculate the expectation value:
$$\begin{align*}\langle\phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert \phi\rangle &= \left\langle \phi\Bigg\vert 1 -\frac{it}{n\hbar} H+ \mathcal{O}(t^2/n^2)\Bigg\vert\phi\right\rangle\\
&=1-\frac{it}{n\hbar} \langle H\rangle+ \langle\mathcal{O}(t^2/n^2)\rangle ,\end{align*}$$
but this seems quite wrong. I'm not really sure where the error exactly happend...

Hope someone can help a bit.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I was able to figure out how to do the first part of the question:
We want to prove that for ##U_{t/n}## defined as above
$$
\underbrace{PU_{t/n}P\dots PU_{t/n}}_{n\text{ times}}P = \langle \phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle ^n P
$$
holds.

Proof by induction:
  • ##n=1##: ##PU_{t/n}P=\vert\phi\rangle \langle\phi\vert U_{t/n} \vert\phi\rangle\langle\phi\vert = \langle\phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle \vert\phi\rangle\langle\phi\vert = \langle\phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle P##
  • Assume that the statement is true for ##n\in\mathbb{N}##.
  • ##n+1##: $$\begin{align*}\underbrace{PU_{t/n}P\dots PU_{t/n}}_{n+1\text{ times}}P &= PU_{t/n}\underbrace{PU_{t/n}P\dots PU_{t/n}}_{n\text{ times}}P = PU_{t/n}\langle\phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle ^n P\\ &=\langle\phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle ^nPU_{t/n}P = \langle\phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle ^{n+1} P\end{align*}$$
I hope this works... Regarding the second part of the question, well I'm still completely clueless.
 
Got a solution to the problem (not my own):
The first part of the problem works just as I showed above. For the second part one can proceed like this:
$$\begin{aligned} \left\langle \phi \left| U _ { t / n } \right| \phi \right\rangle ^ { n } & = \left( \exp \left( - \frac { i ( t / n ) } { \hbar } \langle H \rangle \right) \left( 1 + \mathcal { O } \left( t ^ { 2 } / n ^ { 2 } \right) \right) \right) ^ { n } \\ & = \exp \left( - \frac { i t } { \hbar } \langle H \rangle \right) \left( 1 + \mathcal { O } \left( t ^ { 2 } / n ^ { 2 } \right) \right) ^ { n } \end{aligned}$$
Now one can expand ##\left( 1 + \mathcal { O } \left( t ^ { 2 } / n ^ { 2 } \right) \right) ^ { n } = 1 + n \mathcal { O } \left( t ^ { 2 } / n ^ { 2 } \right) = 1 + \mathcal { O } \left( t ^ { 2 } / n \right)##, so we find
$$\left\langle \phi \left| U _ { t / n } \right| \phi \right\rangle ^ { n } = \exp \left( - \frac { i t } { \hbar } \langle H \rangle \right) \left( 1 + \mathcal { O } \left( t ^ { 2 } / n \right) \right) .$$
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top