Ray tracing diagram for white light moving through glass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on ray tracing for white light passing through glass, emphasizing the behavior of light at different angles of incidence. The bottom ray, striking the glass perpendicularly, travels straight through, while the top ray refracts towards the normal when entering the glass and refracts downwards upon exiting. Participants clarify terminology, noting that "refracted" is the correct term rather than "deflected." There is also a consideration of dispersion, with a suggestion to illustrate the spectrum formed by white light as it passes through the glass. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding refraction and the potential for dispersion in optics.
phosgene
Messages
145
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



White light is incident on a sheet of glass as shown below. Complete the ray tracing diagram.

physicsdiagram.jpg


Homework Equations



n1(sinx)=n2(siny), where n = the refractive index of the medium.

The Attempt at a Solution



The ray on the bottom is hitting the glass at 90 degree angles, so it should just go straight through, right? Whilst the top one is hitting part of the glass at an angle, so it should first be defracted downwards, and then upwards again when it exits the glass. Is that all I need to draw in there, or is there something else that I'm missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phosgene said:

Homework Statement



White light is incident on a sheet of glass as shown below. Complete the ray tracing diagram.

physicsdiagram.jpg


Homework Equations



n1(sinx)=n2(siny), where n = the refractive index of the medium.

The Attempt at a Solution



The ray on the bottom is hitting the glass at 90 degree angles, so it should just go straight through, right? Whilst the top one is hitting part of the glass at an angle, so it should first be defracted downwards, and then upwards again when it exits the glass. Is that all I need to draw in there, or is there something else that I'm missing?
The correct word is 'refracted'.

The top beam is refracted towards the normal in going from air to glass. How about from glass to air?
 
SammyS said:
The correct word is 'refracted'.

The top beam is refracted towards the normal in going from air to glass. How about from glass to air?

Hmm, when it exits the glass, it would be refracted downwards again, wouldn't it?
 
SammyS said:
The top beam is refracted towards the normal in going from air to glass. How about from glass to air?

phosgene said:
Hmm, when it exits the glass, it would be refracted downwards again, wouldn't it?
What is the reason for thinking that? I.e., with respect to the normal in what direction (away from or towards the normal?) would it be refracted, in going from glass to air?
 
Redbelly98 said:
What is the reason for thinking that? I.e., with respect to the normal in what direction (away from or towards the normal?) would it be refracted, in going from glass to air?

Since the refractive index of glass is higher than that of air, the angle of refraction will be higher than the angle of incidence. And for that to happen, the ray would have to move downwards. Is this correct?
 
phosgene said:
Since the refractive index of glass is higher than that of air, the angle of refraction will be higher than the angle of incidence. And for that to happen, the ray would have to move downwards. Is this correct?

Yes - but better to say deflected down rather than move down.

The lead of your question referred specifically to white light. I wonder if you were supposed to show the formation of a spectrum due to dispersion?
 
phosgene said:
Since the refractive index of glass is higher than that of air, the angle of refraction will be higher than the angle of incidence. And for that to happen, the ray would have to move downwards. Is this correct?
Yes. (I just wanted to make sure you had the reasoning in mind -- it's easy to guess when there are just two choices, and other people are questioning your first answer :smile:)

PeterO makes a good point -- it's better to say "refracted downward" (as you had earlier) or deflected downward.
 
Last edited:
PeterO said:
Yes - but better to say deflected down rather than move down.

The lead of your question referred specifically to white light. I wonder if you were supposed to show the formation of a spectrum due to dispersion?

I get confused with all the different words in optics. Thanks for the correction :) And I'm not sure, I was wondering this myself, but the textbook I'm using doesn't go into that much, so I'm assuming that it's not necessary.

Thanks everyone!
 
phosgene said:
I get confused with all the different words in optics. Thanks for the correction :) And I'm not sure, I was wondering this myself, but the textbook I'm using doesn't go into that much, so I'm assuming that it's not necessary.

Thanks everyone!

In case you do need to consider dispersion - a good key for the two ends of the spectrum is

Red - rare
Violet - violent

The red rarely moves - meaning, it is deflected the least
The violet moves violently - meaning it is deflected the most.

Peter
 
  • #10
phosgene said:
Thanks everyone!
You're welcome!
PeterO said:
In case you do need to consider dispersion - a good key for the two ends of the spectrum is

Red - rare
Violet - violent

The red rarely moves - meaning, it is deflected the least
The violet moves violently - meaning it is deflected the most.

Peter
Or if you're an old-timer, just picture the album cover from Dark Side Of The Moon -- and remember that red is the top ray.

cover_2213172112008.JPG
 
  • #11
PeterO said:
In case you do need to consider dispersion - a good key for the two ends of the spectrum is

Red - rare
Violet - violent

The red rarely moves - meaning, it is deflected the least
The violet moves violently - meaning it is deflected the most.

Peter

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind :)
 
Back
Top