Relationship between k and orbital phase of solid state?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between the wave vector \( k \) and the orbital phase in solid-state physics, particularly in the context of band structure plots of energy \( E(k) \) versus \( k \). Participants explore the implications of \( k \) in relation to momentum, orbital angular momentum, and the nature of energy eigenstates in periodic systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how \( k \) relates to the orbital phase and seeks a physical understanding of \( k \), questioning its connection to momentum and orbital angular momentum.
  • Another participant explains that \( k \) is the wave vector related to momentum through \( \mathbf{p} = \hbar \mathbf{k} \) and describes the form of energy eigenstates in a periodic lattice as per Bloch's theorem.
  • A participant raises a question about whether each band in a band structure can be occupied by two electrons, drawing a comparison to molecular orbitals.
  • Another participant clarifies that each band consists of a continuous collection of energy eigenstates, with each eigenstate capable of being occupied by two electrons, and notes that the orbitals change with varying \( k \) values.
  • There is a suggestion to think of \( k \) as an index on the wavefunction, similar to quantum numbers for atomic wave functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing levels of understanding regarding the relationship between \( k \), orbital phase, and the nature of energy bands. While some technical aspects are clarified, there remains uncertainty about the implications of these relationships and no consensus is reached on the fundamental connections.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific theoretical frameworks and models, such as Bloch's theorem and the nature of energy eigenstates in periodic systems, but the discussion does not resolve the foundational questions posed about the physical interpretation of \( k \) and its relationship to orbital phase.

Alec Neeson
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I understand that quantum objects have wave and particle properties. I know that k = 2π / lamda. I am simply not understanding the x-axis of a bandstructure plot of E(k) vs. k. I've read parts of a book by Roald Hoffman on this subject. In the book it is shown that there are infinite chain of hydrogen atoms. K is related to the orbital phase in this book. I am not sure how to connect this k to orbital phase. I've heard k can be a measure of momentum. How exactly is k and the phase of an orbital related? What is the most realistic idea of the notion of k? I want to physically understand k. Does this momentum of k relate to the orbital angular momentum and that is how phase and momentum are related?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I imagine the book you’re referring to is “Solids and Surfaces” by Roald Hoffmann. It’s a really good book for approaching solid state physics from a chemical point of view, but it sounds like you’re struggling with some basic aspects of solid state physics.

##k## is the wave number (more generally, the wave vector) of a particle, which is related to the momentum of the particle by ##\mathbf{p} =\hbar \mathbf{k}##. Bloch’s theorem states that the energy eigenstates of a periodic lattice (such as a crystal) have the form
$$\psi(\mathbf{r})=\exp (i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r})\phi(\mathbf{r})$$
The function ##\phi(\mathbf{r})## is periodic with the same period as the lattice, and the function ##\exp (i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r})## is a plane wave (free particle state) with momentum ##\hbar\mathbf{k}##.

Solving the Schrödinger equation for an atom, for example, gives a discrete spectrum of energy eigenstates, but solving the Schrödinger equation for a periodic system gives a different eigenfunction for each value of ##\mathbf{k}##, which is a continuous variable. So if we were to draw the energy level diagram for a crystal as we would for an atom or molecule, we would simply draw a variable density continuum of states, which is not very enlightening. Instead, we use ##\mathbf{k}## as a kind of “continuous index” and plot ##E## vs. ##\mathbf{k}##. This plot gives us information on the continuous energy bands that are characteristic of a crystal.
 
In a bandstructure diagram of E(k) vs. k : each band can be occupied by 2 electrons similar to a molecular orbital or no? Also, do the orbitals change as you change the k value or just the phase of the orbitals?
 
Alec Neeson said:
each band can be occupied by 2 electrons similar to a molecular orbital or no?
No. Each band is a continuous collection of energy eigenstates. Each eigenstate can be occupied by 2 electrons.
Alec Neeson said:
Also, do the orbitals change as you change the k value or just the phase of the orbitals?
The orbitals themselves change. It might help to think of ##\mathbf{k}## as an index on the wavefunction, just as you’d think of ##n,l,m_l## as indices on atomic wave functions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
555
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
454
Views
30K