Relativistic collisions - different frames, threshold energy

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



(a) Show that E2 - p2c2 is a Lorentz invariant, where E is the total energy, p is the momentum, c is speed of light.

(b) In the lab frame, an utlra-relativistic electron with γ = 100 collides head-on with a photon of energy E. Find the threshold energy E required to create an electron-positron pair.

(c) In another head-on collision with the same setup, the path of the photon is reversed. Find the photon's energy in the electron's rest frame.

(d) Find the back-scattered energy of the photon in the same frame.

(e) Find the KE of the electron in the same frame.

(f) Find the back-scattered energy of photon in LAB frame.

4t60p4.jpg


Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution


e1az3p.jpg

2v0ycls.jpg

jioqdh.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any help would be very appreciated!
 
unscientific said:
Any help would be very appreciated!

Help would be more forthcoming if you said where it's needed.
 
clamtrox said:
Help would be more forthcoming if you said where it's needed.


Part (d): Is it alright to assume the electron remains stationary throughout the collision (Like a tennis ball rebounding against the wall)

Part(e): I'm not sure if this is a trick question, but in the elctron's frame, shouldn't it's own KE = 0?
 
bumpp
 
anyone?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top