Rotating Rigid Body Homework: Find Angular Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves two 2 kg masses on a 5 cm bar rotating around a horizontal axis, with a wax drop impacting one mass at 3 m/s. The key challenge is the omission of the wax drop's mass, which is necessary to calculate the angular velocity after the impact. Participants in the discussion confirm that without this mass, the problem cannot be fully solved, suggesting that the question may be incomplete. They recommend solving the equations in terms of the wax mass 'm' as a temporary measure. The consensus is that the problem's intention is unclear without the missing information.
Faefnir
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two masses of 2 kg are attached to the extremities of a 5 cm long, negligible mass and thin bar, free to rotate around a horizontal axis passing through its center. A drop of wax falls on one of the two masses at ##v = 3 \frac{m}{s}## and sticks to it. Retrieve the angular velocity of the system immediately after the impact

Homework Equations


[/B]
Angular moment:
$$ L = I \cdot \omega $$
$$ L = rp = rmv $$
Inertia moment:
$$ I = (M + M + m) \cdot r^2 $$

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know if the wax drop mass was deliberately omitted in the text, but if so, how can I get it? Without that I can not get ## \omega ##. I know I should do some attempt, but the only thing that comes to mind is the inertia moment for a thin bar

$$ I_{MC} = \frac{1}{12} m \cdot l^{2} $$

Can you help me? Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Faefnir said:
I don't know if the wax drop mass was deliberately omitted in the text, but if so, how can I get it?
You'll need the mass of the wax drop to solve this. Where did you get the problem?
 
An italian homework book. Indeed the latest edition dates back to 2003
 
Oh well. Without the mass the best you can do is solve things in terms of 'm', but that's clearly not the intention since quantities are given for everything else.
 
  • Like
Likes Faefnir
Thank you! You have confirmed that I understand the subject well :D
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top