Rotation Problem: Angular Velocity & Work Done Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter neelakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
AI Thread Summary
A rotating sphere contracts to (1/n)th of its original radius, leading to a change in angular velocity that can be analyzed using the moment of inertia equations. The relationship between initial and final angular velocities is expressed as (2/5)MR^2*w_1=(2/5)M(R-R/n)^2*w_2, indicating a need to calculate the change in angular velocity. The work done during contraction is debated, with suggestions that it relates to changes in gravitational potential energy due to internal forces, particularly if gravity is considered. The energy increase is calculated as (1/2)I'^2 - (1/2)Iw^2, but questions arise about how this relates to work done, especially without specific numerical values for mass and radius. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of internal forces and their impact on energy changes during the contraction process.
neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A rotating sphere contract slowly due to internal forces to (1/n)th of its original radius.What happens to its angular velocity.Show that increase in its energy equals the work done during its contraction.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



(2/5)MR^2*w_1=(2/5)M(R-R/n)^2*w_2

From this we should find the change in w.Am I correct?

Regarding the workdone: Please help me to start with
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shouldn't that just be (R/n). say n is 3, the new radius is 1/3 the old one, from your eqn it would be 2/3. As for work I would assume thit would be due to change in gravitational state--say like a collapsing star, but not sure on this part.
 
Yes,that is R/n.I went wrong first time.

Since w changes to w',the energy increases by (1/2)I'^2-(1/2)Iw^2---this we can compute.
The nexttask is to show this is equal to work done.We are told that internal forces are responsible for contraction...but does it do work?Self work should be zero...isn't it?
 
Not if the internal force is say gravity. I believe there is a differnce in potential energy between the two shells which is equal to the change in kinetic energy. But again not sure, it may be the work in going from I to I'
 
Last edited:
That sounds good,but contains an inconsistency.Say,the internal force is gravity.Then,work done will be a function of G,M(not given),r1,r2 etc.Unless you are working with numerals,how can you say that will equal
(1/2)I'^2-(1/2)Iw^2?
 
I think the internal force may be given by mw^2*r, where w as well as r are changing.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top