Rotational Equilibrium Lab Question

AI Thread Summary
In a physics lab focused on demonstrating rotational equilibrium, the apparatus includes a boom and a tensioned string/pulley system. The forces are measured in Newtons, while the moment arms are in centimeters, raising a question about the necessity of unit conversion. It is confirmed that converting moment arm measurements to meters is essential for consistency in calculations, as the Newton is defined in terms of kilograms and meters. The discussion emphasizes the importance of ensuring all units align correctly for accurate results. Accurate unit conversion is crucial for successful lab outcomes.
CLeSure
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
In my general physics lab, we are trying to show that certain systems are in equilibrium. The apparatus that we are using for rotational equilibrium consists of a boom resting on an axis point, attached to a string/pully that has a given tension.

The measured forces in the lab are in Newtons, but the measurements of the Moment Arms are in centimeters. Will I need to convert my measurements into meters before doing my calculations?

Thanks.

Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CLeSure said:
In my general physics lab, we are trying to show that certain systems are in equilibrium. The apparatus that we are using for rotational equilibrium consists of a boom resting on an axis point, attached to a string/pully that has a given tension.

The measured forces in the lab are in Newtons, but the measurements of the Moment Arms are in centimeters. Will I need to convert my measurements into meters before doing my calculations?

Thanks.

Chris

What are the units of a Newton?
 
LowlyPion said:
What are the units of a Newton?

The forces were originally in grams, so we converted them to Newotons by mutliplying the mass by 10^-3, then multiplying b y 9.8 m/s So... the Newton would be Kg*m/s...

This is why I was thinking I had to convert my measurements to meters, so everything jived together. Am I correct in thinking this?
 
CLeSure said:
The forces were originally in grams, so we converted them to Newotons by mutliplying the mass by 10^-3, then multiplying b y 9.8 m/s So... the Newton would be Kg*m/s...

This is why I was thinking I had to convert my measurements to meters, so everything jived together. Am I correct in thinking this?

Most definitely.

Be more certain next time. Facts are facts.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top