Rotational force caused by a rod through the radius of a cylinder

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rotational force exerted by a rod inserted through the radius of a cylinder when it rotates and touches the surface. Participants clarify the setup, emphasizing that the rod is placed in a frictionless manner and can slide out to a certain extent. The focus is on understanding the forces at play when the rod, assumed to be weightless except for weights at its ends, strikes the surface during rotation. Key considerations include the angle of the rod and how this affects the downward and sideways forces. The conversation seeks to establish a method for translating these linear forces into rotational forces as the cylinder rolls.
jehubuddaka
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am playing with math and physics during my off-time at work, and I am wondering how to calculate a specific force, or if I am even looking at it correctly. Here it is.

A rod through a cylinder's radius so that if it is off to one side causes rotational force equal to the difference in foot poundsof the two sides seems simple enough. But what happens once the cylinder has rotated enough so that the end of the rod is touching the same surface that the cylinder is resting on? How do I calculate that force. I am assuming that the cylinder has a hole through it just larger than the rod to allow motion. Where is the force applied? Thanks in advance for the answers :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I find your description a bit unclear, so let me ask. You have this cylinder lying down on a surface, a rod is inserted "in the side of it", ie. in radial direction so that it's not symmetrical but only points out on one side of the cylinder. And then you rotate it from one side til it hits the surface on the other drawing out the path of a half circle?
 
This problem was posted before, but I don't recall the exact wording required to find that thread or the answer.

Assume a rod goes through a pair of frictionless holes or perhaps even better, a frictionless tube across the diameter of the cylinder. Assume that the initial condtion is that the end of the rod rests on the same surface as the cylinder. What are the forces, and could any movement result from these forces?

In the previous case, there wasn't any maximum length given to the rod, so a very long rod could be well extended, resting on the surface at a near horizontal angle. Another critical point would be when the rod was vertical (assume the rod has a rounded end and ther's no rolling resistance). I'm not sure if the rod was considered to have any mass at all in the previous thread.
 
Yes Jeff has my basic description covered quite well. Frictionless hole through the diameter with a rod inserted into that hole. basically tip the cylinder onto one of its flats, then insert a rod through it from left to right, directly through the middle of the cylinder. then tip it back up onto its round side and you've got a good idea of how the rod placement should be. The only thing other than that to remember is that the rod is free to slip out of the hole to a certain distance. Now, with this information, how would I calculate what kind of resistance to continued rotation would be caused when the protruding end of the rod strikes the surface that the cylinder is rolling on?

Add: I am trying to calculate as if the rod is weightless, but with 1lb of weight at either end located exactly on the ends of the rod. My theory is that the weight of the rod is pushing down and sideways with a downward force equal to a larger amount for angles closer to horizontal, and vice versa for the sideways push. Am I anywhere near How I should be thinking on this? And how does this linear force translate to rotational force?
 
Last edited:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top