Shear stress at boundary of wall = 0

AI Thread Summary
Shear stress at the boundary of a wall is zero because when calculating the first moment of area (Q), the area above the point of interest yields Q=0. This is due to the absence of any area above the boundary, while the area below must consider the centroid's position relative to the neutral axis. The signs of the first moments of area must be accounted for, as they can cancel out when the centroid is above or below the neutral axis. It is recommended to choose the area that simplifies calculations to minimize errors. Understanding the signs and positions of areas is crucial for accurate shear stress calculations.
chetzread
Messages
798
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



in the formula of shear stress τ = (V)(Q) / It ,
Q=Ay = first moment of inertia of area, the area can be located above(or bottom) at the point of interest)
when the chosen point is at the wall(boundary) , why shear stress = 0?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


When i choose area above the point of interest, there's nothing above A, so i understand that Q=0, shear stress = 0
But, when I choose the area below the point of interest, it's the whole coloured part, right? how can Q= 0 ?
 

Attachments

  • 351.png
    351.png
    93.4 KB · Views: 432
  • 352.png
    352.png
    94.1 KB · Views: 419
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
At the top of the section, Q is 0 regardless of whether you use the area above or below that section of interest in its calculation. Please show how you calculate Q. What is the value of y-bar when using the lower area?
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
PhanthomJay said:
At the top of the section, Q is 0 regardless of whether you use the area above or below that section of interest in its calculation. Please show how you calculate Q. What is the value of y-bar when using the lower area?
Q = (102.1x 10)(120.2 +5) + (240.4 x 6.4)(0 )+ (102.1x 10)(120.2 +5) , which is not 0
 
It is simpler for this special case to look at the entire area and recognize that since it's centroid lies along the neutral axis, then y-bar of the entire area is 0. But in general, your method is fine, except that first moments of area have positive and negative signs associated with them. So if you consider the first moment of the top flange area as plus, then the first moment of the bottom flange area has the same numerical value, but it is minus.
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
PhanthomJay said:
It is simpler for this special case to look at the entire area and recognize that since it's centroid lies along the neutral axis, then y-bar of the entire area is 0. But in general, your method is fine, except that first moments of area have positive and negative signs associated with them. So if you consider the first moment of the top flange area as plus, then the first moment of the bottom flange area has the same numerical value, but it is minus.
Why the moment at upper and below parts have different sign?
 
Because ybar is above the neutral axis in one case, and below it in the other. The area moments thus cancel.
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
PhanthomJay said:
Because ybar is above the neutral axis in one case, and below it in the other. The area moments thus cancel.
why we don't have to cancel off them when we are calculating the first area moment of inertia in normal case(not this case) ?
Why it is necessary to cancel off them in this case?
 
When the neutral axis is below the section of interest where you want to calculate Q, and you use the area above the section of interest in your calculation for Q, then all ybar values of the area parts are of the same sign, and there is nothing to cancel. Although you have a choice to use the area above or below the section of interest, use the easier of these choices. There is less chance of error this way.
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
PhanthomJay said:
When the neutral axis is below the section of interest where you want to calculate Q, and you use the area above the section of interest in your calculation for Q, then all ybar values of the area parts are of the same sign, and there is nothing to cancel. Although you have a choice to use the area above or below the section of interest, use the easier of these choices. There is less chance of error this way.
What do you mean ?
If i consider the area above the point of interest , the area above point A ( in the notes) will be 0 ...Q = 0
why you said that same sign ? and cancel ? there's nothing to be canceled off , right ?
 
  • #10
Oh I thought you meant in general . At the top of the beam, yes, Q is 0.
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #11
PhanthomJay said:
Oh I thought you meant in general . At the top of the beam, yes, Q is 0.
how if we considering the area below point A? why there's a need to put negative value for ybar?
I have an example here...When we are calcualting the moment of inertia about the neutral axis (Ixx), we dont have to put negative sign for ybar although it's the area below the neutral axis( x - axis)
refer to the example below
 

Attachments

  • 354.jpg
    354.jpg
    26.3 KB · Views: 411
  • 355.jpg
    355.jpg
    32.6 KB · Views: 369
  • #12
First moment of area Q is A times y. It can be plus or minus. Second moment of area I is A times y squared. Square a negative and you get a positive, right?
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #13
PhanthomJay said:
First moment of area Q is A times y. It can be plus or minus. Second moment of area I is A times y squared. Square a negative and you get a positive, right?
Sorry, refer to this example, there
PhanthomJay said:
First moment of area Q is A times y. It can be plus or minus. Second moment of area I is A times y squared. Square a negative and you get a positive, right?
sorry, i posted the wrong example...
anyway, here's an example, the author doesn't consider ybar of the area below the neutral axis as negative...Everything is positive...
 

Attachments

  • 358.jpg
    358.jpg
    28.2 KB · Views: 368
  • #14
I think you posted the wrong example. Anyway, you keep fighting the minus sign. Whether using moment areas to calculate deflections, or Q, or centroids, you must consider the signage or you will continue to get the wrong answers.
 
  • Like
Likes chetzread
  • #15
PhanthomJay said:
I think you posted the wrong example. Anyway, you keep fighting the minus sign. Whether using moment areas to calculate deflections, or Q, or centroids, you must consider the signage or you will continue to get the wrong answers.
I am very sorry for that.
Here's the example, can you refer to it again...There's no negative sign involve for ybar in this question
 

Attachments

  • 357.jpg
    357.jpg
    18.3 KB · Views: 364
  • 358.jpg
    358.jpg
    28.2 KB · Views: 405
  • #16
In determining the centroid of the section, the author is summing moment areas about the bottom, so ybar is always positive for all areas. There's a couple of half holes that complicate the problem because the area of those holes subtract and are considered negative. I urge you again to start with the simpler cases before tackling the complex.
 
  • #17
PhanthomJay said:
In determining the centroid of the section, the author is summing moment areas about the bottom, so ybar is always positive for all areas. There's a couple of half holes that complicate the problem because the area of those holes subtract and are considered negative. I urge you again to start with the simpler cases before tackling the complex.
ok, i noticed the difference between the 2 cases already...
 

Similar threads

Back
Top