Show that: Translator operator can be expressed in terms of

  • Thread starter Thread starter Diomarte
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Terms
Diomarte
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The translation operator T(a) is defined to be such that: T(a)ψ(x) = ψ(x+a)
Show that:
T(a) can be expressed in terms of the operator p = -iħ d/dx
and T(a) is unitary.

Homework Equations



T(a)ψ(x) = ψ(x+a)
p = -iħ d/dx

The Attempt at a Solution



I honestly have no idea how to start this expression, I figured there may be some way of doing it in a Taylor's expansion maybe, but I'm not sure how that would work, and that's the only guess I have on how to start this. Could anybody possibly give me some direction on where to start, please? Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Enough experience in physics will teach you that Taylor expansions can do anything ;-) In particular, whenever you have a parametrized operator like this, it's usually useful to consider small values of the parameter. So try assuming that a is very small, write out the series expansion for whatever needs to be expanded, and see where that takes you.
 
Ok, I seem to have figured that part out, now my second part is to show that T(a) is Unitary.
Thank you very much for your help, and hopefully showing that T(a) is unitary shouldn't be terrible difficult since if I'm correct I've got I think the correct results came out to be T(a)ψ(x) = exp(iap/ħ)ψ(x) = f(x+a)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top