Simple Energy Equation for Pendulum

  • Thread starter Thread starter joe_23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Pendulum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the equation of motion for a simple pendulum using energy methods, specifically addressing the roles of translational and rotational kinetic energy. It establishes that for a point mass at the end of a massless rod, the moment of inertia (I) is effectively zero, allowing the kinetic energy to be attributed solely to translational motion. The importance of potential energy in the overall energy equation is also highlighted, emphasizing its role in the pendulum's dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of translational kinetic energy (T = 1/2mv^2)
  • Knowledge of rotational kinetic energy (T = 1/2Iw^2)
  • Familiarity with the concept of moment of inertia (I = mr^2)
  • Basic principles of energy conservation in mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the simple pendulum equation using energy methods
  • Explore the implications of potential energy in oscillatory motion
  • Learn about the differences between point masses and extended bodies in rotational dynamics
  • Investigate the application of Euler's method in solving differential equations of motion
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in the dynamics of pendulum motion and energy conservation principles.

joe_23
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Solve for the equation of motion of a simple pendulum using energy methods assuming it is a massless rod with a point mass at the end

Homework Equations



Translational Kinetic Energy T = 1/2mv^2

m is mass and v is linear velocity

Rotational Kinetic Energy T = 1/2Iw^2

I = mr^2

I is inertia, and w is angular velocity, r is mass radius

The Attempt at a Solution


I've read many times that the total kinetic energy of a mechanical system is a combination of the translational energy and the rotational energy. If my understanding is correct, then taking your mouse cursor and moving it in a circle would be only translational motion since the cursor's orientation is always the same relative to an inertial RF (it is upright at all times). For a pendulum, the mass at the end would rotate with the rod (its not upright at all times- instead it tilts from one side to the other), and therefore has rotational motion in addition to the linear motion of the path of its CM . Is there something wrong in my logic? Using Newtons or eulers method gives you the same result as omitting the rotational kinetic energy term (or linear since theyre equal) so I would like to know why my logic is not correct.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This question comes from pretty much all physics textbooks; is the answer that they model the mass at the end as being very small so that I is zero and can be ignored?
 
Welcome to Physics Forums!
joe_23 said:
This question comes from pretty much all physics textbooks; is the answer that they model the mass at the end as being very small so that I is zero and can be ignored?
Yes. Point masses have zero moment of inertia, so the kinetic energy is completely due to translational motion.

Don't forget about the potential energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K