Maximizing Force in Simple Harmonic Motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter erisedk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum force exerted by a system of two masses connected to a vertical spring. The smaller mass of 1 kg oscillates with an angular frequency of 25 rad/s and an amplitude of 1.6 cm, while the larger mass of 4 kg remains stationary. The maximum force on the ground is calculated to be 60 N, which includes the weight of the 4 kg block and the spring force from the compressed spring. A key point of contention is whether to include the weight of the 1 kg mass in the force calculation, with clarification that the equilibrium position shifts due to the 1 kg mass's weight. Ultimately, the correct approach considers both the spring compression and the weight of the upper block, leading to the accurate force calculation.
erisedk
Messages
372
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Two bodies of masses 1 kg and 4 kg are connected to a vertical spring, as shown in the figure. The smaller mass executes simple harmonic motion of angular frequency 25 rad/s, and amplitude 1.6 cm while the bigger mass remains stationary on the ground. The maximum force exerted by the system on the floor is (take g=10ms−2)
99887.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


ω = √k/m
So, k = mω2 = 1×252 = 625
The maximum force will be exerted on the floor when the 1kg mass is at the lowest position, as the spring will be highly compressed and will push the bottom block.
So, total force on ground = 4g + kA + 1g
= 40 + 625*1.6*10-2 + 10
= 60 N

Now, someone asked me why I was adding the weight of the upper block ie. 1g as it isn't directly interacting with the 4 kg block. Only the spring force (and weight of 4kg block) are acting on the 4kg block, so the normal reaction should only depend on the two but not on the upper block. I don't know how to justify this even though I intuitively feel that the weight of the 1kg block should be added as it is part of the system. Can somebody provide a more rigorous explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a common mistake to include forces as acting on a body which is not directly subject to the force. It is certainly the case that all you should count here is the weight of the lower block and the spring compression. But, have you correctly calculated the spring compression force? You multiplied k by the amplitude.
Suppose the upper block is only executing very small gentle oscillations. Will the spring ever be under tension? What will your kA method calculate as the compression in the spring when the upper block is at its highest point?
 
Thank you! Got it.
The equilibrium position is itself shifted. Hence, when the system is in equilibrium, assuming that the spring is compressed by x0
kx0 = mg (m=1kg)
When it goes further down, i.e to the lowest position, the spring force on the block is
F = k(A+x0)
= kA + kx0
= kA + mg
This is why I was getting the right answer even though I hadn't really thought about it well.
 
erisedk said:
Thank you! Got it.
The equilibrium position is itself shifted. Hence, when the system is in equilibrium, assuming that the spring is compressed by x0
kx0 = mg (m=1kg)
When it goes further down, i.e to the lowest position, the spring force on the block is
F = k(A+x0)
= kA + kx0
= kA + mg
This is why I was getting the right answer even though I hadn't really thought about it well.
Well done.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top