Simple lab calculation (Magneticfield vectors)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the Earth's magnetic field density (B) using a laboratory setup where a rod is parallel to the Earth's magnetic field and a current of 2.89 amps is applied. The calculated magnetic field density for the X component is approximately 1.65 x 10^-5 Tesla. The resultant vector (B-res) is determined to be around 2.02 x 10^-5 T, and the Y-component is calculated using Pythagorean theorem, yielding approximately 1.16 x 10^-5 T. The calculations confirm that the compass needle's deviation aligns with the resultant vector. Overall, the methodology and results appear accurate for the given parameters.
Xeno24
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I = 2.89amps, r = 0.035m, resultant vector angle (55), proporptionality constant (2 x 10^-7)

Homework Equations



B = K X I / r , trigonometry, vector divisions.

The Attempt at a Solution



Hi, I'm just pasting this off my lab to make sure I've done it correctly. Thanks in advance.

Lab:

A rod is put, parallel to the Earth's magnetic field (due north)with a compass needle 0.035m below it. A flow of 2.89amps is switched on and the compass needle deviates 55 degrees due east as the current creates a magnetic field of its' own.

Question - Calculate the Earth's magnetic field density (B) using these vectors.

Using the formula above the field density for the X component is

(2 x 10^-7) x 2.89amp
------------------------------ = 1.651428571 x 10 ^- 5 Tesla
0.035m

To find the resultant vector (B-res), I used

Cos(35) = B-x/B-res, B-x/Cos(35) = B-res,

1.651428571 x 10 ^- 5 T

----------------------------------- = B-res
Cos(35)

B-res = 2,016022035 x 10^-5 T

And finally with Pythagoras you can find the vector of the Y-component,
______________
\/B-res^2 – B-x^2 = 1,156342737 x 10^-5 T

~ 12microT
Since the compass stays in the resultant vector (Bres),
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good. You could also use the fact that

tan(35 deg) = ____ / ____ ?

which gets you from Bwire to Bearth in a single step, without the need to calculate Bres.

p.s. welcome to PF :smile:
 
Thanks. :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top