I really think i'm not understanding this correctly and I haven't had a chance to think it through, but i'm confused about the issue of simultaneity in special relativity.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

As I understand it, a simultaneous event happens at exactly the same time in some reference frame. Special relativity says that a simultaneous does not have to be simultaneous in other reference frames.

I think my issue is that I'm not sure how an observer determines when an event occurs. For example. consider two light bulbs on a line 100 meters apart, with observer A exactly half way between them, and observer B 1000 meters away from one bulb, and 1100 meters away from the other. Both are at rest, relative to the bulbs, and each other obviously. As I understand it, the flashing of the bulbs is a valid event, so suppose the bulbs are flashed so that observer A detects the flash at the same time. Then to observer A, the events are simultaneous. But to observer B, the events are then obviously not simultaneous, since there is a difference in distance from each bulb. Is it then valid to say that simultaneity is lost? even though A and B are in the same frame?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Simultaneity in Special relativity

Loading...

Similar Threads - Simultaneity Special relativity | Date |
---|---|

B I cannot grasp simultaneity in Special Relativity | Jan 20, 2018 |

B Order of events and cause and effect | Dec 27, 2017 |

I Einstein clock syncing with one way light emission absorber | Jun 28, 2017 |

I Confusion with relativity of simultaneity | Apr 26, 2017 |

I Velocity addition and relativity of simultaneity | Mar 9, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**