Slit diffraction with a beam of spatially distributed intensity

shyree
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have the classic slit-diffraction experiment, where light is incident on two narrow slits on a screen and is diffracted to create a pattern of maxima and minima on the far surface. It is usually assumed that the light incident on the slits is uniform. In practice, the light generally varies a little bit, i.e. you have a spatial distribution of intensity rather than one intensity, so the intensity of the incident light through each slit is a little bit different.


The Attempt at a Solution



I started by summing the diffracted bits of electric field:

E = E(0)e^i(kr - wt) + E(0)e^i(k(r + dsin(theta)) - wt) + E(0)e^i(k(r + 2dsin(theta)) - wt)...

If all the E(0)'s are the same, they can be pulled out from the exponential, and then the exponential can be summed alone and a trig identity used to change it into an equation with sines instead of e^1(thing)'s. If they're all different...

E = Ae^i(kr - wt) + Be^i(k(r + dsin(theta)) - wt) + Ce^i(k(r + (N-1)dsin(theta)) - wt)

let (phi) = kdsin(theta)

E = e^i(kr - wt)*(A + Be^i(phi) + Ce^i2(phi))

and I can't get it to simplify any more than that. Is there a way to get this into a form with sines and cosines? Failing that, is there a way to graph this as-is to get the distribution pattern? I haven't been able to find any graphing software that'll play nice with e^i factors.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't you need to make those r's into (r-r0)'s (vectorwise)? You refer to a 2-slit problem in your problem statement, but in your solution you are dealing with multiple slits. You should take the real part of the result, which will be a sum of products of sines and cosines.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top