(Solid State) low resistivity dependance on temperature

SMC
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For some applications it is important to minimize the temperature dependence of electronic components. For example, there is a special alloy called constantan that can be used for temperature independent resistance elements. Do you expect constantan to have a high or low density of lattice defects? Justify your answer.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


so i assume it has low density of lattice defects because if resistance remains constant then scattering time is also constant which means that there are no defects for the electron to scatter off of. would this statement be correct?

thank you for any advice you can give me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SMC said:

Homework Statement


For some applications it is important to minimize the temperature dependence of electronic components. For example, there is a special alloy called constantan that can be used for temperature independent resistance elements. Do you expect constantan to have a high or low density of lattice defects? Justify your answer.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


so i assume it has low density of lattice defects because if resistance remains constant then scattering time is also constant which means that there are no defects for the electron to scatter off of. would this statement be correct?

thank you for any advice you can give me

Certainly the resistivity depends on defect density, but how is Constantan made? Why does it have a low coefficient of resistivity?
 
well i know constantan is an alloy of copper and nickel which I guess have fairly small nuclei which which increases scattering time and decreases resistivity. I'm not sure I fully understood what you're asking though
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top