Solid State Solid State Physics Book for BS Hons Course

AI Thread Summary
For a Bachelor of Science Honors course in Solid State Physics, "Ashcroft and Mermin" is highly recommended, although some users note it may feel dated. "Kittel" is suggested as a more accessible introductory text with self-sufficient chapters. "Yu and Cardona" is favored for its up-to-date content and comprehensive coverage, addressing topics not included in Ashcroft and Mermin. "Grosso and Parravicini" is also mentioned as a potential resource.
Faisal Moshiur
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Can you recommend a book of Solid State Physics for BS Hons course?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ashcroft and Mermin
 
  • Like
Likes M Quack and vanhees71
I second Ashcroft and Mermin. But I am unfamiliar with recent books. I used Ashcroft and Mermin > 35 years ago
 
Kittel: somewhat better for an intro, at least the chapters are self sufficient to some extent.

Yu and Cardona is my favorite, up to date and includes all the stuff Ashcroft and Mermin do not cover.
 
Grosso and Parravicini
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
88
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
7K
Back
Top