Solutions of Heisenberg Equations of Motion for Angular Momenta

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the solutions of Heisenberg equations of motion specifically related to angular momenta. Participants are examining coupled differential equations that describe the time evolution of angular momentum components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the structure of the differential equations, with one suggesting differentiation of the equations to clarify solutions. Questions arise regarding the implications of a zero time derivative and the relationship between angular momentum components.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring the mathematical relationships between the equations. Some guidance has been offered regarding differentiation, and there is an ongoing examination of the implications of the results, particularly concerning the equality of angular momentum components.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the original poster's equations being coupled and the potential implications of the solutions, as well as the assumption that one component remains constant. The context suggests a focus on understanding the behavior of angular momentum in quantum mechanics.

Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2
Hey guys,

Imma type this up in word so its nice and clear!

http://imageshack.com/a/img32/2013/3q8s.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equations look right to me, although I don't have a lot of time to check thoroughly right now. So your equations are coupled differential equations, right? They are of the form

$$y_1' = a y_2$$
$$y_2' = -a y_1$$
$$y_3' = 0$$

where the prime mark denotes differentiation. The last equation should be simplest to solve. What does it mean if a quantity's time derivative is zero? Does it change?

For the other two, I'm a bit rusty on some parts of differential equations, but I would start by taking the time derivative of your first two equations. See if doing that makes a solution clear.
 
damn, sorry posted by accident. Let me type that again
 
So our first equation is:

[itex]\frac{d<L_{x}>}{dt}=\omega_L <L_{y}>[/itex]

If we differentiate this again w.r.t time:

[itex]\frac{d^2 <L_{x}>}{dt^2}=\omega_L \frac{d<L_{y}>}{dt}[/itex]

But we know from our second equation that

[itex]\frac{d<L_{y}>}{dt}=-\omega_L <L_{x}>[/itex]

Substituting gives

[itex]\frac{d^2 <L_{x}>}{dt^2}=-\omega^{2}_{L} <L_{x}>[/itex]

Which has the solution [itex]<L_{x}>=A cos(\omega_L t) + B sin(\omega_L t)[/itex]

But the weird thing is: if we repeat this same thing for the second differential equation, we get the same thing - that is

[itex]\frac{d^2 <L_{y}>}{dt^2}=-\omega^{2}_{L} <L_{y}>[/itex]

So does this basically mean that [itex]<L_{x}>=<L_{y}>[/itex] and that [itex]<L_{z}>[/itex] is constant? I don't see how it can make sense that [itex]<L_{x}>=<L_{y}>[/itex]...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K