Solve Equilibrium Problem: 4 Men Carrying Beam, Calculate Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter yasar1967
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves four men carrying a uniform beam in equilibrium, with two men at the ends and two men positioned inward. The forces acting on the men must balance the weight of the beam, leading to the equation Mg = 2xFno + 2xFni. However, the situation is statically indeterminate, meaning there are multiple valid force distributions that satisfy the equilibrium conditions. Without additional information, such as the specific forces each man exerts, it is impossible to determine unique values for the normal forces. Assuming an even distribution of weight is one possible simplification to approach the problem.
yasar1967
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
1. Four people carry a uniform beam of length L (with mass M) holding it horizontal. Two men hold it at the ends while the remaining two are inward but nevertheless all men are equally apart from each other i.e. if the beam is 4m long the distance from 1st to 2nd is 1m; 2nd to 3rd is 2m and 3rd to 4th is 1m.
Calculate the normal forces acting upon the men.




2. System is in equilibrium, static. general force and torque formulas apply.



3. I assumed due to symmetry, outward Fn forces and inward Fn forces must be equal. Therefore Mg=2xFno+2xFni
The problem is the SAME equation stems from torque formula as well and as I have two identical formulas with two unknowns, I get nowhere.
Where did I go wrong?


 
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't go wrong. The problem is statically indeterminate--you just don't have enough information. For example: The two end people can lift 90% of the weight if they want and the two guys in the middle could just pretend to help. That and many other combinations of forces are consistent with the given information.

Of course, you could just assume that the load is evenly distributed.

(Also: If they are evenly spaced and the board is 4m long, they are 4/3 m apart.)
 
thank you
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top