Solve Kinematics (3 in 1) Problems with Omid

  • Thread starter Thread starter Omid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving kinematics problems related to stopping distance and yellow light timing at an intersection. The first problem involves calculating the smallest stopping distance (S_s) when driving at 35 km/h, with a suggested formula provided. The second problem requires formulating the yellow light duration (t_y) based on the stopping distance and intersection width, though confusion arises regarding the independence of S_s in the equation. The final inquiry addresses how long the yellow light should remain lit, considering various factors, with a focus on the speed's impact on timing. Overall, participants seek clarity on the relationships between stopping distance, speed, and yellow light duration.
Omid
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
Here there are 3 related problems which I need help with them :

37. Imagine that you are driving toward an intersection at a speed v_i just as the light changes from green to yellow. Assuming a response time of 0.6 s and an acceleration of -6.9 m/s^2, write an expression for the smallest distance (S_s) from the corner in which you could stop in time. How much is that if you are traveling 35 km/h?


I suggest this expression :
S_s= (v_i) (0.6 s) - [((v_i)^2) / 2a ]
And 12.67 as the numeric answer for the second part.

38. Considering the previous problem, it should be clear that the yellow light might reasonably be set for a time t_y, which is long enough for a car to traverse the distance equal to both S_s and the width of the intersection S_I.
Assuming a constant speed v_i equal to the legal limit, write an equation for t_y, which is independent of S_s.

I just don't get this one.

40. With problems 37 and 38 in mind, how long should the yellow light stay lit if we assume a driver response time of 0.6 s, an acceleration of -6.9 m/s^2, a speed of 35 km/h, and an intersection 25 m wide ? Which of the several contributing aspects requires the greatest time ?

I don't understand this one too.

Thanks
Omid
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest this expression :
S_s= (v_i) (0.6 s) - [((v_i)^2) / 2a ]
And 12.67 as the numeric answer for the second part.

You wrote "-" in the formula but clearly intended "+" (and used + to get 12.67)

38. You already have a formula for S_s. S_i is just some (given) fixed number. The distance you need to "traverse" as speed v_i is just the sum of those:
(v_i) (0.6 s) + [((v_i)^2) / 2a ] + S_i. What time is needed to go that distance at constant speed v_i ?

40. Now that you have finished 38 (what happened to 39?) just put the numbers you are given: v_i= 35, S_i= 25, etc. into the formula.
 
Yet there are 2 questions for me.
1. The formula for t_y ( problem 38 ) is not INDEPENDENT of S_s as the problem asks to be (our formula is : (v_i) (0.6 s) + [((v_i)^2) / 2a ] + S_i which is equivalently (v_i) (0.6 s) + [ S_s ] + S_i ).
2. Which of the several contributing aspects requires the greatest time ?
I think it's v_i, isn't it ?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Back
Top