Solve the Relativity Paradox: Two Objects Moving at Light Speed

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jujufactory
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox Relativity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion addresses the "Twin Paradox" in the context of special relativity, specifically regarding two objects, A and B, moving at relativistic speeds. Both objects perceive the other's clock as running slower due to time dilation. Upon meeting, the elapsed time on their clocks may differ based on their paths and whether symmetry is maintained. If one object accelerates, it breaks the symmetry, leading to different elapsed times on their clocks. This phenomenon does not undermine relativity but rather illustrates its complexities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Familiarity with time dilation concepts
  • Knowledge of the Twin Paradox scenario
  • Basic grasp of relativistic speeds and acceleration effects
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical framework of special relativity
  • Explore detailed explanations of the Twin Paradox
  • Research the implications of acceleration in relativistic contexts
  • Examine case studies involving time dilation in high-speed travel
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of special relativity and the implications of time dilation in high-speed scenarios.

jujufactory
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Could somebody please clear up this paradox for me.

Two objects, A and B, are moving past each other at close to the speed of light relative to each other.

So far so good.

Object A looks at object B and sees object B fly by at close to the speed of light. Object A figures time dilatation takes effect and concludes the clocks on B are moving more slowly than on A.

Object B looks at object A and concludes the same thing.

A while later, the two objects meet up with each other and compare clocks. Are their clocks indicating the same time or different times? Which clock is ahead? If none of the clocks are ahead, then what happened to relativity?

This ongoing paradox seems to undermine the entire theory. Could somebody clear up this paradox. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no paradox, whilst it is counterintutive that both should see each other's clocks running slower than their own, it's not inconsistant.

When they meet up for a second time their clocks can show either the same or different amount of times elapsed. This depends on how they meet up (i.e. the details of the accelartion, path, etc). Generally speaking if they maintain symmetry between each other they will show the same amount of time elapsed, if they break the symmetry then they will show a different amount of time elapsed.
 
The Twin Paradox

jujufactory said:
A while later, the two objects meet up with each other and compare clocks.
In order for the two "objects" to meet up and compare clocks, at least one of them must accelerate. That breaks the symmetry.

This situation is usually called the "Twin Paradox" and has been discussed here many times in numerous threads. Rather than start yet another thread on this same old thing, I recommend that you search the archives. Also read this: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_paradox.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K