Solving a Puzzling Problem: Equal and Opposite Forces on a Rod

  • Thread starter Thread starter conquerer7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Rod
AI Thread Summary
In a system where equal and opposite forces are applied to a uniform rod on a frictionless surface, the net external force is zero, leading to no translational motion of the center of mass. However, the rod will rotate around its center of mass due to the applied forces creating torque. This results in angular momentum despite the center of mass remaining stationary. The confusion arises from the expectation of translational motion, which does not occur because the net force acting on the rod is zero. Ultimately, the rod experiences rotation without any movement of its center of mass.
conquerer7
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Here's a dumb question I came up with that I'm not seeing the answer to.

For any system of particles, F_ext = M a_cm. Consider a uniform rod lying on a frictionless surface:

-----------^
----------------
--------------v

Equal and opposite forces are exerted on the rod where the ^ and v are. The net external force is zero, so the center of mass, which is at the center of the rod, does not move. But obviously it would move if you applied those forces, right? The whole thing would rotate around a point between the two points of application.

I'm probably making a really stupid mistake in thinking about this, so some help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think that they have a different point of application? Both force vectors act at the center of mass.

-------^ N
-------|--------
-------v Fg

Or are you referring to some other forces, not the weight and the normal?
 
Last edited:
Nope, no weight and normal. This is a top-down view and I apply those two forces myself by, say, tapping the rod there.
 
conquerer7 said:
Nope, no weight and normal. This is a top-down view and I apply those two forces myself by, say, tapping the rod there.

If you only give two taps at those points ,the final result will be a rotation about the center of mass along with a translational motion of the center of mass. Since you have a torque the rod will gain angular momentum .The motion of the rod exactly when the forces are applied is probably a mathematical mess.
 
Where does the translational motion of the CM come from? The net force is zero, so the acceleration of the CM should be zero as well, right?
 
Right. The center of mass wouldn't move, and the rod would rotate about it. That might not match up with what you intuitively think will happen, but that's what happens.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top