Solving Combined circuit question

  • Thread starter Thread starter NeomiXD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a combined circuit diagram by simplifying it into series and parallel components. The user successfully combined resistors R5 and R6 into R8, and then R4 with R8 into R9, while also combining R1, R2, and R3 into R10. The main challenge lies in determining whether to add R7 and R9 together using the series formula or leave them separate. To find the total current and voltages across each resistor, it's suggested to first calculate the total current through the series components and then use Ohm's law to find individual voltages and currents for the resistors. Ultimately, the approach involves simplifying the circuit while ensuring the relationships between the components are maintained for accurate calculations.
NeomiXD
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I've attached a conbined circuit diagram to this post. I have to solve the circuit. I know that I have to simplify the diagram into a series circuit to make it easier to solve, but I'm having trouble with a few parts in the diagram.

This is how I simplified so far:

1. I added R6 and R5 together using the series formula. I labeled it R8.

2. I added R4 and R8 together using the parallel formula. I labeled it R9.

3. I added R1, R2 and R3 together using the parallel formula. I labeled it R10.

This is where I'm having difficulty. Do I add R7 and R9 (from step 2) together using the series formula or do I leave it the way it is.
 

Attachments

  • image001.png
    image001.png
    6.6 KB · Views: 396
Physics news on Phys.org
NeomiXD said:
This is where I'm having difficulty. Do I add R7 and R9 (from step 2) together using the series formula or do I leave it the way it is.

It looks as though you can add R7 + R9 + R10. They are all in series.

What you add when really depends upon what it is you're ultimately trying to solve for. If it's just the total current that the battery will be producing, then by all means reduce everything to a single resistance!
 
I actually have to find the following:

RT = ?
IT = ?
I1 =?
I3 =?
I6 =?
I4 = ?
V2 = ?
V5 = ?
V7 = ?

I tried solving by adding R7 and R9 (from step 2) together using the series formula. I only had to find 2 more values (V7 and I7)but then I had difficulty figuring out how to find the value of V7 and I7 when only R7 was available.
 
The current through R7 must be equal to the total current, since it is a series circuit and it is a series component of that circuit. Use Ohm's law to work out the voltage across it given the current through it.

You can always "undo" any of your combinations to get at the individual components. For example, once you solve for the total current, you know that it flows through R7, R9, and R10. Therefore you can determine the voltages across each of those resistances. Now, R10 is really three resistors in parallel. So you now have the voltage that is across each of them (parallel resistors all have the same voltage across them). So you can use Ohm's law to determine the individual currents for each of the three resistors (these currents should add up to the total current).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top