Solving Displacement Without Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter cheer_chic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Displacement Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving an equation for displacement without using time, utilizing the equations d(t) = vit + 1/2 at² and vf = vi + at. Participants suggest solving for time in the second equation and substituting it into the first to eliminate time from the displacement equation. One user demonstrates the process of rearranging and substituting, ultimately arriving at the equation d = (v² - u²) / (2a). The conversation emphasizes the importance of using only the provided equations and confirms the definitions of initial and final velocity. The thread concludes with a clear solution for displacement that adheres to the constraints given.
cheer_chic
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We are supposed to derive an equation that solves for displacement that does not use time. We can use these two equations. d(t) = vit + 1/2 at squared. or d(t) = 1/2 (vit + vft) t

It's due tomorrow. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Should be a piece o'cake. You have:

d=vit+(1/2)at2

and you also have:

vf=vi+at.

Try to combine those to get the equation you are looking for. If you get stuck, show us how you started and we will help you from there.
 
Help

I'm not sure if I decoded the equation lines very well... but i think this is how you do it.

Take the second equation and solve for time and then substitute that equation into the first equation and that will get rid of the time.

If I'm not helping at all, watch... (^2 is squared)

d= 1/2 (vit + vft) t (expand t)
= 1/2 (vit^2 + vft^2) (pull out t^2)
= 1/2 t^2 (vi + vf) (multiply both sides by 2)
2d = t^2 (vi +vf) (some rearranging)
t= the square root of (2d /vi+vf)

Now, wherever there is a t in the first equation, substitute the equation that you found...

:)
I hope that is right ...
 
Tom, I'm not sure that she is allowed to use any other formulas either than the two she is given... Do you agree with my work?
 
I assume vi = v(intial) and vf = v(final), usually v(initial) is denoted as 'u' and v(final) as 'v'.

It's a very simple equation, it's a simple case of re-arranging one of the equations and substitung it into the other, you should be able to do it yourself but for your reference the answer is:

d = (v2/2 - uv)/a
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top