Solving for different masses in pulley system with KE

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving an Atwood's machine with two masses, m1 and m2, where the system reaches a speed of 10.0 m/s after 6.0 seconds and has a kinetic energy of 90 J. The user attempts to derive equations based on kinetic energy and work but struggles with the algebra and the relationships between the forces acting on the masses. Key points include the need to express the net forces on each mass in terms of tension and gravitational force, leading to equations that can be solved simultaneously. The conversation emphasizes eliminating tension to find a relationship between m1 and m2. Ultimately, the user seeks clarity on how to connect these equations to find the unknown masses.
jb007
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So I am stuck on this homework problem. I understand the general direction I have to take, but my algebra and physics aren't good. Here's the problem:
A simple Atwood's machine uses two masses, m1 and m2. Starting from rest, the speed of the two masses is 10.0 m/s at the end of 6.0 s. At that instant, the kinetic energy of the system is 90 J and each mass has moved a distance of 30.0 m. Determine the values of m1 and m2.

Homework Equations


Wnet = change in KE
total KE of the system = 0.5(m1)v^2 + 0.5(m2)v^2
W = force * distance

The Attempt at a Solution


My work so far has not really gotten me anywhere, any tips would be very helpful.

First, I saw that the KE of the system would be the KE equation but with m 1 and m 2 , like this: KE = 0.5(m1+m2 )v^2, or 90=0.5(m1+m2 )v^2, or 90=0.5(m1+m2 )100

So then then m1+m2 would be equal to 9/5.

I'm not sure about this next part I've done: The net work is equal to the change in KE. Since the system starts from rest, the initial KE is 0, and the final KE is 90.

So I did: W=0.5(m1+m2 )100. Then using the work equation: FΔX=0.5(m1+m2)100, and since ΔX is equal to 30m: 30F=0.5(m1+m2)100

I tried substituting in the acceleration in order to get the force of the masses, 10/6=5/3m/s/s, so weight 1 = m1*5/3, and weight 2 = m2*5/3.

With these, I know there is supposed to be 2 equations for 2 unknowns, but I can't seem to figure them out. I'm kind of lost at his point.

I've uploaded a picture of the problem. I believe I'm headed in the right direction. Any tips?
 

Attachments

  • q11.jpg
    q11.jpg
    28.8 KB · Views: 558
Physics news on Phys.org
jb007 said:
30F=0.5(m1+m2)100
And what is F?
edit: You actually don't need to worry about F; what is the kinetic energy?

jb007 said:
I tried substituting in the acceleration in order to get the force of the masses, 10/6=5/3m/s/s, so weight 1 = m1*5/3, and weight 2 = m2*5/3.
This is not right. The weight 1 = m1g and the weight 2 = m2g
 
Nathanael said:
And what is F?
edit: You actually don't need to worry about F; what is the kinetic energy?This is not right. The weight 1 = m1g and the weight 2 = m2g
The total kinetic energy is 90J. So would it be 90=0.5(m1+m2)v^2, which solving for m1+m2 would get me 9/5kg, like I had before. I'm failing to see the connection between this and the force.
I think the net force on m1 should be T-m1g, where T is the tension. And the net force on m2 should be T-m2g? And would T be equal to the sum of the weights of the blocks?
 
jb007 said:
I think the net force on m1 should be T-m1g, where T is the tension. And the net force on m2 should be T-m2g?
Good. Do you know a relationship between the net force and acceleration?
 
Nathanael said:
Good. Do you know a relationship between the net force and acceleration?
Ok, so then by F=ma, the net force for object 1 would be T-m1g=m1a, and the net force for object 2 would be T-m2g = m2a.
Then since a is the same for each object, (T-m1g)/m1 = (T-m2g)/m2?
 
jb007 said:
Ok, so then by F=ma, the net force for object 1 would be T-m1g=m1a, and the net force for object 2 would be T-m2g = m2a.
Then since a is the same for each object, (T-m1g)/m1 = (T-m2g)/m2?
Right, but there's no need to eliminate the acceleration a
Use the two equations to eliminate the tension T
Then you will you have your second relationship between m1 and m2
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top