Solving KCD Question: Understanding I1=I2/I1+2

  • Thread starter Thread starter wencme
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding the application of the current divider rule in two circuit examples. Participants express understanding of the current divider concept but struggle with why I3 is analyzed in the first circuit while I4 is excluded in the second. Clarification is sought on whether superposition is being utilized to determine the currents. The conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of how the current divider operates in different scenarios. Overall, the focus is on resolving the inconsistencies in applying the current divider rule across the examples.
wencme
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I understand the current divider and generally comprehend what this professor is saying. BUT, I do not understand why to look only at I3 in the top circuit and look at everything except I4 in the bottom example.

I1= I2/I1+2 so looking at I3 makes sense to me in the first example, but it seems that I should also be looking at I3 in the second example.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
wencme said:
I understand the current divider and generally comprehend what this professor is saying. BUT, I do not understand why to look only at I3 in the top circuit and look at everything except I4 in the bottom example.

I1= I2/I1+2 so looking at I3 makes sense to me in the first example, but it seems that I should also be looking at I3 in the second example.

Welcome to the PF.

Can you say more about what is going on in this example? Are they demonstrating how to use superposition to solve for the currents in the original circuit?
 
Yes, we are simply finding the currents in the circuit.
I'm just having a hard time understanding how the current divider is being used.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
187
Views
57K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top