Solving kinetic energy of reaction's products

Ryan.L
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is my first thread in this forum, please forgive me if I made any mistake on posting.

Homework Equations



I am having difficulty on solving the Problem 5.

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer I obtained is 1.5MeV, is it correct ?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4878.JPG
    IMG_4878.JPG
    54 KB · Views: 551
Physics news on Phys.org
i think its 2.5MeV
the mass defect of X is 2MeV since the K.E. released(energy of the products) must be equal to the mass defect.
in 2nd eqn, the mass defect is sum of Mass defect of X and the electron
therefore we add 0.5MeV to the X's 2.0MeV to get 2.5MeVproton007007
 
Hello Ryan, welcome to PF :)
Just so you learn from your 'mistakes': "I am having difficulty on solving the Problem 5" does not count as a relevant equation. Neither does " The answer I obtained is 1.5MeV, is it correct ? " count as an attempt at solution. PF has this template for very good reasons (see guidelines). We're not here to stamp-approve homework, but to help people along. So we need to know where you are and you can show by properly formulating the problem (i.e. not linking to a rotated test page) and listing off variables & known/given data, line up the equations you think you need and show what you have done.

I also have a question for proton: in the sescond reaction you also don't have to create a positron. Doesn't that yield another .5 MeV ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top