Solving Magnetic Field of Magnetized Copper Rod: Find H Inside & Outside

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saraharris38
  • Start date Start date
Saraharris38
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A long copper rod of radius R has uniformly distributed free current I. Find the value of H inside and outside the rod

Homework Equations



∫Hdl=I(free enclosed)

The Attempt at a Solution



Copper is diamagnetic so the magnetization will be circumferential and opposite of B, producing a downwards bound current inside and an upwards bound current on the surface. We can use ampere's law to calculate H:

∫Hdl=I(free enclosed). The path dl is the amperian loop inside, with s<R, so

H(2πs)= I(free enclosed)

How do I find I(free enclosed)? Isn't it just I?

Thanks! If the explanation could be as explicit as possible, that would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would be right if the loop you made was outside of the rod. Then the total current enclosed is I. But, if the loop is inside the rod then only a fraction of the current exists in your loop. Knowing that the current is uniform is a hint on how to calculate the fraction of current inside of your loop.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top