Solving Part B of a Homework Problem Involving Principal of Moments

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving part B of a homework problem involving the principle of moments. The initial approach involved taking moments about point C and calculating a force of 250N, but the book's solution indicates a force of 290N at a different angle. Participants suggest considering lateral forces and drawing a free body diagram (FBD) for rod BA to analyze equilibrium. By incorporating these additional forces, the correct lateral force of 210N was determined, aligning with the book's answer. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accounting for both vertical and horizontal components in the analysis.
OnlinePhysicsTutor
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Please see attached picture

Homework Equations


principal of moments
IMG_3477.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


part a) is fine. For part b, I would Normally take moments about C. The force acting on BC at B must be the tension in AB. The geometry of the triangle gives and angle of 53.1 to the horizontal, and moments gives a force of 250N. However the solution in my book says 290N at and angle of 43.6 degree to the horizontal, so I'm not sure if I have missed something, taking into account compressive tension along BC doesn't seem to work. Any pointers would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you assuming that the force at BC is along the line BA? That would give you 53.1o, but is not necessarily the case.
 
kuruman said:
Are you assuming that the force at BC is along the line BA? That would give you 53.1o, but is not necessarily the case.
edit; I assume the book answer is taking into account some lateral force also on AB, but I don't see how I would calculate that.
 
Look at rod BC. What would the forces acting on it look like? How big a vertical component do you have at B acting on rod BC? Rod BA would have an equal amount acting on it at B but in the opposite direction (Newton's 3rd law). Now, if you can find the horizontal component on BA at point B, you can find the tangent of the angle that you are seeking without any assumptions about its value.
 
  • Like
Likes OnlinePhysicsTutor
OnlinePhysicsTutor said:
edit; I assume the book answer is taking into account some lateral force also on AB, but I don't see how I would calculate that.

Draw a FBD of rod BA and demand that it be in equilibrium, just like you did for the entire triangle. You know (or should be able to figure out) all but the lateral force.

On edit: Don't forget there is a force with a vertical and horizontal component at point A as well.
 
I get it now, thank you. I did moments on AB, gives a lateral force of 210N, which then works out to give the answer in the book.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top