Solving the Mystery of a Mechanical Device: Where is the Error?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a mechanical device involving a torus and a square object containing balls affected by springs. The user is struggling to identify an error in their calculations related to torque and potential energy, specifically noting that the sum of forces on the square object is not zero while the torus experiences no torque. They have attempted to simplify their diagrams and calculations to clarify the forces at play, including pressure from the balls and the effects of the springs. Ultimately, the user seeks assistance in pinpointing the error in their analysis of the system's mechanics. The complexity of the device's design and the interactions between the components are central to resolving the issue.
Gh778
Messages
419
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I imagined this device and I don't understand where is the error. I posted here because it's a simple mechanical device, I have trouble with the sum of torque. The potential energy must be constant. I think I forgot a torque, if you see where ?

A torus turns counterclockwise around the center C1. C1 is fixed to the ground. The center C2 is fixed to the torus and a square object can turn around C2. I put inside the square Object a lot of small balls where there isn't the torus. Each ball is attracked by a spring (not drawn). The springs attrack balls like gravity can do, but Gravity1 is higher than Gravity2. I called it gravity but it's not a gravity it's just for have a pressure with balls like water can do in a recipient. The springs are attached on the green points, and the green points are on the square Object not on the torus. I drawn all forces I see and I can have the sum of forces on the center C2 like the yellow force so the torus don't receive a torque from C2. In the contrary the square Object with balls inside receives a net torque on it. The square Object will turn counterclockwise BUT I turn the torus counterclockwise more and more in the time for have the same angular velocity for the square Object and the torus. The angular velocity of the torus "follows" the angular velocity of the square Object for keep constant the angle. I need an energy for accelerate the torus but this energy can be recover later. In the contrary, I don't give an energy for rotate the square Object but with time it turns more and more, and the potential energy seems to increase. I need to accelerate more and more the torus but I don't think the problem come from this particulary. What's wrong in this device ?

The device:

image.jpg


The forces:

image.jpg


Where the balls are inside the square object:

image.jpg
Several positions of the device, for show the angle:

image.jpg
 

Attachments

  • h1.png
    h1.png
    23.3 KB · Views: 427
  • h2.png
    h2.png
    29.1 KB · Views: 461
  • h3.png
    h3.png
    39 KB · Views: 372
  • h4.png
    h4.png
    12.6 KB · Views: 360
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm not trying to be rude, but your diagrams and your descriptions are very convoluted. I don't think anyone can give you a straight answer until you simplify some of this.
 
You're right, I drawn so many forces. Maybe, first, just study the square Object without the torus. I drawn 3 springs for show where they are, one end of a spring is attached to a green point and another end to a ball. I don't drawn all green points. There is one spring for one ball. The forces F4, F5 and F6 come from the pressure of balls, it's like the pressure in water with gravity. The forces F1, F2 and F3 come from the forces on the green points from springs, all springs attrack the balls to the "bottom" (bottom on the image). I drawn red forces for show how a spring attrack. F1+F2+F3 is lower than F4+F5+F6 because the torus has a curved shape. The forces F7, F8 and F9 come from the pressure in another part of the square Object, it's not the same force of attraction so forces are smaller than the right part. The square Object with the forces of pressure and force from springs are like that:

dsf2.jpg


Tell me if that first step is ok for you please ? Maybe I'm wrong in these forces.
 

Attachments

  • dsf2.png
    dsf2.png
    33.1 KB · Views: 443
Last edited:
With gravity + water, there is forces from pressure at left, at right and at bottom, I have this : (I did not draw all forces)

im1.jpg


If I want to have the same pressure at left and at right but now with balls and springs without gravity (I can't draw all springs, but there is one spring for each ball). Note the forces from springs are to up and there is forces of pressure at bottom too. I have this:

f69.jpg


Now, with the square object I want 2 areas (areas are separated) with 2 differents attraction (attraction1 > attraction2) but it's the same, I use springs and balls (balls are compressible), like that do you understand my forces ?

fgth2.jpg


Note there is the torus so some forces are on the torus not on the square object.
 

Attachments

  • im1.png
    im1.png
    5.3 KB · Views: 445
  • fgth2.png
    fgth2.png
    40.1 KB · Views: 464
  • f69.png
    f69.png
    26.5 KB · Views: 381
Last edited:
I changed my diagram maybe like that it's clear enough ?

dty2.jpg


I noted the pressure at right from 0 to 10 and the pressure at left from 0 to 2 (it can be bars for example). So, I drawn only the forces from the springs. The pressure gives forces at right and at left that I symbolized with 3 different forces in my last messages. The balls are compressible. It's possible to have a torque on the object and not on the support.

With only the Attraction2 :

attract2.jpg


There is not a up force from the springs because balls pressure to the bottom in the same time. There are forces from pressure at left.

With only the Attraction1:

ftg52.jpg


Here, there are up forces from the springs.
 

Attachments

  • ftg52.png
    ftg52.png
    19.6 KB · Views: 429
  • attract2.png
    attract2.png
    13.3 KB · Views: 430
Last edited:
I understood my error, I forgot the pressure at bottom higher than the forces from the springs. So I calculated the torque on the object and the torque on the support in this easier device. I increase the height of the object. The sum of torque on the support is 0 but the sum of torque on the red object is not zero. I use the springs for create the pressure. The springs are fixed on the bottom, on the green points.

cbb2.jpg


cb1.jpg


I noted:

'c' the length of the "square"
'R' the outer radius of the torus
'd' the distance c1c2 x or y-axis (look at the second image)

I fixed values: c=3 and R=6.5, d=4.34 for have an idea of the datas

I consider the pressure like the height of the balls because I can choose with springs.

**************************************************************************CALCULATION*********************************************************************

******************************************Springs**************************************
Start integration x:
s1=d-c/2=2.84

Middle integration x:
sm=d=4.34

End integration x:
s2=d+c/2=5.84

Height:
H=d+c/2=5.84

Integration1:
\frac{1}{c/2}\int_{s1}^{sm} (H-\sqrt(R^2-x^2))(d-x) dx

Integration2:
\frac{1}{c/2}\int_{sm}^{s2} (H-\sqrt(R^2-x^2))(d-x) dx

Values: -0.20+1.63

Sum of forces:
\frac{1}{c}\int_{s1}^{s2} (H-\sqrt(R^2-x^2)) dx

Value: 1.15

******************************************Right side**************************************

\frac{1}{c/2}\int_{0}^{c/2} x(-x+\frac{c}{2}) dx

\frac{1}{c/2}\int_{c/2}^{c} x(x-\frac{c}{2}) dx

Values: -0.37+1.87

Sum of forces:
Value: c/2=1.5

******************************************Left side**************************************

I want to cancel the sum of forces on C2, so I need to have Fx at 1.5-1.15=0.35

The additionnal clockwise torque on the object will be:

Value: -0.35*4.34=-1.5

*******************************************Results**************************************

Torque on the object: -0.20+1.63-0.37+1.87-1.5=1.42

Torque on the support: 0

If you could help me to find my error ?
 
Last edited:
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top