[Special Relativity] Energy-momentum invariant question

Inquisitus
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I was just wondering why what I've done in a spec rel question is wrong.

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m is traveling at 0.8c with respect to the lab frame towards an identical particle that is stationary with respect to the lab frame. If the particles undergo an inelastic collision and coalesce, what is the fractional change in the system's kinetic energy as measured from the lab frame?

http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/6922/croppercapture1io7.png

Homework Equations



p=\gamma m v
E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2

The Attempt at a Solution



http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/6559/croppercapture3vr8.png

My lecturer marked the first line here as being wrong; he said that for the momentum term in the denominator I should have put 2m rather than just m. However, my thinking here was that since the momentum of a system is conserved within any given frame, the momentum prior to the collision should be the same as following the collision, which is why I used \gamma m v c rather than \gamma m_1 v_1 c. This makes things vastly simpler as we know the velocity of the moving particle prior to the collision, but we don't know the velocity of two particles after the collision.

Has my lecturer just misunderstood what I was doing, or am I doing something wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your logic is right, but you've computed the ratio of the total energies, not the kinetic energies. Just subtract out the total rest mass in the numerator and denominator and it should work.
 
Whoops, I actually meant total energies rather than kinetic energies, sorry :smile:

I'll see my lecturer tomorrow and see what he says. Thanks for the help!
 
Whoops, I actually meant total energies rather than kinetic energies, sorry
The total energy of the system cannot change. And the system's mass is definitely not 2m. The problem seems well stated, but neither your approach nor what your tutor told you seem correct.
 
Ich said:
The total energy of the system cannot change. And the system's mass is definitely not 2m. The problem seems well stated, but neither your approach nor what your tutor told you seem correct.

Well the question asked what the fractional change in the systems total energy is upon the particle's collision; it was just a type in my post. The question, everything I've learnt, my solution to the problem, and my lecturer all say that this is possible :confused:
 
Sorry, I was assuming that since this is an inelastic collision, we shouldn't expect energy to be conserved (ie, some of it would go into heat, sound, etc). But assuming these are the only two particles around, and there is no radiation, the only way for energy to be conserved is if the rest mass of the particles increases (as would happen, for example, if some of the energy is converted into heat). In this case we have, both before and after the collision:

p^{tot}_\mu= ( \gamma m c^2, \gamma m v, 0, 0) + (mc^2,0,0,0)

= ( (\gamma + 1 ) m c^2, \gamma m v, 0, 0)

The velocity of a single particle with four momentum p_\mu can be read off as v_i = c^2 p_i/p_0, giving the resulting particle a velocity of:

v' = c^2 \frac{\gamma m v}{ (\gamma + 1 ) m c^2} = \frac{\gamma}{\gamma+1} v

and a rest mass of

m' = \frac{1}{c^2}\sqrt{p_0^2 - c^2p_1^2} = \sqrt{ (\gamma+1)^2 m^2 c^4 - \gamma^2 m^2 v^2 c^2 } = m \sqrt{ (\gamma+1)^2 - \gamma^2 \frac{v^2}{c^2}}

= m \sqrt{ (\gamma+1)^2 - (\gamma^2 -1)} = m \sqrt{2(\gamma+1)}
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top