Special Relativity Math Thing (Fresnel's Drag Coefficient)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a potential typo in a textbook regarding Fresnel's Drag Coefficient, questioning whether "x = v/c" should be "x = v/(nc)." Participants clarify that both expressions have the same order of magnitude, with the index of refraction (n) typically approximated as 1. The focus remains on the significance of using "v/c" in the context of special relativity. Ultimately, the consensus is that the difference is negligible for practical purposes.
Mark Zhu
Messages
32
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Because v<<c in this case, we can expand the denominator
(1 + x)^-1 = 1 - x + ... keeping only the lowest term in x
v/c. The above equation becomes...
Relevant Equations
(1 + x)^-1 = 1 - x + ...
I am wondering if there is a typo in my textbook. Please see the attachment. The textbook says "...keeping only the lowest term in x = v/c." I am wondering if it should be "x = v/(nc)," as I circled in blue on the left side. It is a binomial expansion of the denominator. Shouldn't x be v/(nc) instead of v/c? The textbook says "...keeping only the lowest term in x = v/c." Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • Capture1.PNG
    Capture1.PNG
    47.6 KB · Views: 155
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't make any difference. ##\frac v c## and ##\frac v {nc}## have the same order of magnitude.
 
What do you mean same order of magnitude? Isn't n the index of refraction?
 
Mark Zhu said:
What do you mean same order of magnitude? Isn't n the index of refraction?
It's ##\frac v c## that is important. You probably have ##n \approx 1## in any case.
 
Thank you for your help
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top