Special Relativity Moving Frames Question

knowLittle
Messages
307
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


I am sort of reviving this thread.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=182511
My question is the same.
I understand and agree with what fisix responded a few years ago.

Homework Equations


cos( θ)= v_cart / v_bullet


The Attempt at a Solution


I can gather that in the reference frame of the cart, the bullet will appear to just go straight up and straight down.
And, in the reference frame of the ground, the bullet will look following a parabolic path.
Nevertheless, I cannot discern how to obtain the angle.

It seems to me that it has to be lesser or equal than pi/2.
I am not looking for the direct answer, but I just don't know how to proceed.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
angle...

This reminds me of the Einstein thought experiment with a person standing on a moving train, tosses a ball straight up and sees it move straight up, then straight down right back into their hand.

Note, if you assume no air, the lack of a train surrounding the cart/cannon and ball makes no difference, you should shoot the cannon ball straight up, given the cart experiences no acceleration during the balls flight and there is no air resistance (as in a train, the air travels with you), the ball will naturally return from whence it was shot, the cart frame of reference is non-accelerating and therefore the ball remains in its frame at least in the direction of the carts travel, of course in the direction straight up it enters another frame, but at right angles to the carts direction and so the net effect is zero on that vector.

Now, from someone on the ground observing the cart, the cannon it carries and the ball it shoots, the situation appears very different.

Remember, the ball already has a velocity in the direction of the cart when it is 'tosses' up, and given no resistance from air, will happily keep this velocity during its flight.

So answer is, shoot the ball straight up! Don't accelerate the cart during flight, given no air resistance, get out of the way for its return as there's no terminal velocity involved to help slow the balls return :-)
 
Last edited:
Thanks.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top