Speed of electron in electric field question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of an electron released between two positive point charges. Initial calculations using net force and acceleration yield an implausible speed. A suggestion is made to apply electric potential and conservation of energy instead, resulting in a potential difference of 183.1V. The energy gained by the electron is calculated, leading to a speed of approximately 8.02x10^-6 m/s. Participants emphasize the importance of accurate unit handling and the need for careful verification of calculations before submission.
lowcard2
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two stationary positive point charges, charge 1 of magnitude 3.55 and charge 2 of magnitude 1.60 , are separated by a distance of 55.0cm. An electron is released from rest at the point midway between the two charges, and it moves along the line connecting the two charges.

What is the speed of the electron when it is 10.0 from charge 1?

The attempt at a solution

Fnet = kQe/r² - kqe/r² = [(9x10^9)(1.6x10^-19)/0.275²][3.8 - 2]x10^-9

Fnet = 3.71x10^-17

a = Fnet/m = 4.076x10^13

t² = 2ax = 2.855x10^6

t = (10^6)√6.32 = 2.855x10^6 m/s

v(x) = 2.855x10^6 m/s x 4.076x10^13

but answer doesn't make sense

thank you all for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lowcard2 said:

Homework Statement


Two stationary positive point charges, charge 1 of magnitude 3.55 and charge 2 of magnitude 1.60 , are separated by a distance of 55.0cm. An electron is released from rest at the point midway between the two charges, and it moves along the line connecting the two charges.

What is the speed of the electron when it is 10.0 from charge 1?

The attempt at a solution

Fnet = kQe/r² - kqe/r² = [(9x10^9)(1.6x10^-19)/0.275²][3.8 - 2]x10^-9

Fnet = 3.71x10^-17

a = Fnet/m = 4.076x10^13

t² = 2ax = 2.855x10^6

t = (10^6)√6.32 = 2.855x10^6 m/s

v(x) = 2.855x10^6 m/s x 4.076x10^13

but answer doesn't make sense

thank you all for your time
Hello lowcard2. Welcome to PF !

As the electron moves, the force on it changes, and therefore so does it's acceleration.

I suggest doing this problem using electric potential & conservation of energy.
 
thank you for the welcome!

forgot to include units in question. nC charges and cm distances
can someone check this?

Potential at a point: V = kq/r.

Relative to charge 1, the potentials are V1i = (9x10^9)(3.55)(10^-9)/(0.275) = 116 volts before, and
V1f = (9x10^9)(3.55)(10^-9)/(0.10) = 3.20x10^11319.5volts after.
Potential difference: 203.5V

Relative to charge 2, V2i = (9x10^9)(1.60)(10^-9)/(0.275) = 52.4 volts before, and
V2f = (9x10^9)(1.60)/(0.45) = 32 volts after.
Potential difference: -20.4V

Those differences are in opposite directions (one pulls left, the other right), so 203.5 -20.4V = 183.1V

Energy gained by an electron traveling down that gradient: qV = (1.6x10^-19)(183.1) = 2.93x10^-17 joules.

2.93x10^-17 = 1/2(9.11x10^-31kg)v^2
v=8.02x10^-6
 
lowcard2 said:
thank you for the welcome!

forgot to include units in question. nC charges and cm distances
can someone check this?

Potential at a point: V = kq/r.

Relative to charge 1, the potentials are V1i = (9x10^9)(3.55)(10^-9)/(0.275) = 116 volts before, and
V1f = (9x10^9)(3.55)(10^-9)/(0.10) = 3.20x10^11319.5volts after.
Potential difference: 203.5V

Relative to charge 2, V2i = (9x10^9)(1.60)(10^-9)/(0.275) = 52.4 volts before, and
V2f = (9x10^9)(1.60)/(0.45) = 32 volts after.
Potential difference: -20.4V

Those differences are in opposite directions (one pulls left, the other right), so 203.5 -20.4V = 183.1V

Energy gained by an electron traveling down that gradient: qV = (1.6x10^-19)(183.1) = 2.93x10^-17 joules.

2.93x10^-17 = 1/2(9.11x10^-31kg)v^2
v=8.02x10^-6
How can you divide something on the order of 10-17 by something on the order of 10-34 and wind up with something much less than 1 ?
 
sorry that's not supposed to be ^-6. its positive

any input would be great. I only have one submission left so i have no room for error
 
Last edited:
i have a couple hours to submit. any more comments? thank you guys
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top