Spring - Damper - Mass System (in series)

LittleFill
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Spring - Damper - Mass System in series

fixed-----Spring-----Damper-----Mass----->F
c d m
--> -->
x1 x2

I need help setting up the equations, I know it has to have 2 subsystems but I just can't figure out the two equations I'm supposed to get.

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could it be something like:

m d(x1 + x2)/dt^2 = F - d dx2/dt

c x1 = d dx2/dtAs in:

Mass x acceleration = external force - counteracting damper force
Spring force = damper force (= reaction force on the fixed 'wall')

With the origin of the X axis at the fixed wall (duh) and its plus direction pointing to the right.

Took x1 and x2 to be the lengths of the spring and damper, respectively. ('Picture' isn't too clear.)
Just in case they're really the positions of the spring-damper midpoint and the mass, well... replace x1 + x2 with x2 and wherever it says x2 above should become x2 -x1...
 
yea it is after stayin a while in the library and looking at a couple of books i finally figured it out.
and it was x1-x2 and x2-x1 i really should have looked at my drawing again after it was posted it was much clearer before i pressed on submit (alot of empty spaces weren't there anymore)

thank you!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
586
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top