Square Root Practice: Multiplying by 1000NM/kJ

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the multiplication by 1000 NM/kJ within a square root, which is identified as a units conversion. Participants clarify that multiplying by "1" facilitates converting between different units while maintaining the equation's integrity. There is confusion regarding the inconsistent use of symbols for meters and joules, with some expressing frustration over the lack of clarity. The use of mixed units, such as [25 + 273K], is also criticized for being misleading. Overall, the thread highlights the importance of consistent unit representation in technical discussions.
sandmanvgc
Messages
26
Reaction score
1
Summary:: Why are you multiplying by 1000NM/kJ within square root?

Practice problem for FE

[Thread moved from the technical forums so no Homework Template is shown]
 

Attachments

  • DAF2536F-7DDC-4896-B5CC-56289A94BC6D.jpeg
    DAF2536F-7DDC-4896-B5CC-56289A94BC6D.jpeg
    45.7 KB · Views: 145
  • A8CCC693-A099-402E-935A-4C374FFA91D6.jpeg
    A8CCC693-A099-402E-935A-4C374FFA91D6.jpeg
    34.7 KB · Views: 166
Physics news on Phys.org
sandmanvgc said:
Why are you multiplying by 1000NM/kJ within square root?
It's just a units conversion. Multiply by "1" whenever you want to convert from one set of units to another (and have the two sets of units in the numerator and denominator with appropriate multipliers to keep the fraction = 1):

$$1 = \frac{1000 N m}{1kJ}$$

Or in words, "1000 Newton-meters is equal to 1 kiloJoule" :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
BTW, they appear to be using both "M" and "m" for meters. Or am I misinterpreting something?

1609185386665.png
 
  • Like
Likes sandmanvgc
Yes, just as they use j and J for joules. Pure carelessness.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
mjc123 said:
Yes, just as they use j and J for joules. Pure carelessness.
That threw me off
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
berkeman said:
BTW, they appear to be using both "M" and "m" for meters. Or am I misinterpreting something?

View attachment 275275

They are all over the place with units. They also have [25 + 273K] as if only the second term has units. Totally bizarre.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top