Static Equilibrium and a uniform rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the minimum distance from point A at which an additional weight equal to the rod's weight can be hung without causing the rod to slip. The rod is 4.00 meters long, supported by a cable at one end and resting against a wall at the other, with a static friction coefficient of 0.500. The forces acting on the rod include its weight, the tension in the cable, and the friction force at point A. The analysis involves applying static equilibrium principles, where the horizontal and vertical forces must balance, leading to equations that relate tension, friction, and weight. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure that the friction force is sufficient to prevent slipping when the additional weight is added.
BillytheKid
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
One end of a uniform 4.00-m long rod of weight Fg is supported by a cable. The other end rests against the wall, where it is held by friction. The coefficient of static friction between the wall and the rod is = 0.500. Determine the minimum distance x from point A at which an additional weight Fg (the same as the weight of the rod) can be hung without causing the rod to slip at point A. Angle cable and beam make is 36 degrees

I'm just staring at the problem we have done a lot in class involving the tension in the cable and how far one could walk before the beam breaks but that involves the beam being at a hinge on the wall. I have seen one only involving friction. I could use some hints
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BillytheKid said:
One end of a uniform 4.00-m long rod of weight Fg is supported by a cable. The other end rests against the wall, where it is held by friction. The coefficient of static friction between the wall and the rod is = 0.500. Determine the minimum distance x from point A at which an additional weight Fg (the same as the weight of the rod) can be hung without causing the rod to slip at point A. Angle cable and beam make is 36 degrees

I'm just staring at the problem we have done a lot in class involving the tension in the cable and how far one could walk before the beam breaks but that involves the beam being at a hinge on the wall. I have seen one only involving friction. I could use some hints
What you describe appears to be a lever with a fulcrum at the cable end. The issue is how much torque can be applied to this lever arm. The maximum downward force at A (contact point between rod and wall) without slipping is a function of the horizontal component of the force at A times \mu_s.

Does that help?

AM
 


To solve this problem, we can use the concept of static equilibrium, which states that the forces acting on an object must be balanced for it to remain stationary. In this case, the forces acting on the rod are its weight (Fg) and the tension in the cable (T). We can also consider the friction force (Ff) acting at point A, which must be equal and opposite to the horizontal component of the tension in the cable.

First, let's draw a free body diagram of the rod:

At point A, the forces acting on the rod are the tension in the cable (T), the weight of the rod (Fg), and the friction force (Ff). The angle between the cable and the rod is 36 degrees, so the horizontal component of the tension (Tcos36) is equal to the friction force (Ff). We can also see that the vertical component of the tension (Tsin36) is equal to the weight of the rod (Fg).

Since the rod is in static equilibrium, the sum of the forces in the horizontal direction must be equal to zero:

Tcos36 - Ff = 0

Substituting in the value for the friction force (Ff = μFg), we get:

Tcos36 - μFg = 0

Similarly, the sum of the forces in the vertical direction must also be equal to zero:

Tsin36 - Fg = 0

Substituting in the value for the weight of the rod (Fg), we get:

Tsin36 - Fg = 0

Now, we can solve for the tension in the cable (T) by using the Pythagorean theorem:

T = √(Tcos36)^2 + (Tsin36)^2

Plugging in the values, we get:

T = √((μFg)^2 + (Fg)^2)

Next, we can use the fact that the additional weight (Fg) will cause the rod to slip at point A. This means that the friction force (Ff) must be equal to or greater than the horizontal component of the tension (Tcos36):

Ff ≥ Tcos36

Substituting in the value for the friction force (Ff = μFg) and the tension (T), we get:

μFg ≥ √((μFg)^2 + (Fg)^2)cos36
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top