Static Friction: Rotational & Translational Effects and Accelerations

AI Thread Summary
Static friction plays a crucial role in enabling objects like wheels to roll across surfaces by allowing them to move without slipping. It facilitates the rotation around the point of contact while also contributing to translational movement. In scenarios where static friction is not overcome, such as a block on a frictionless floor, it can lead to acceleration when a force is applied, but this does not directly mean static friction is accelerating the object. On inclined planes, gravitational forces interact with static friction, allowing smooth rolling until the applied force exceeds static friction, causing slipping. Understanding these dynamics is essential for analyzing motion in both rotational and translational contexts.
Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
When an object, such as a wheel, rolls across a surface, static friction allows it to move. When taking into account rotational motion accompanied by translational motion across such a surface, what effect does static friction have on it other than allowing the object to move? Furthermore...what are the situations for which static friction can accelerate an object?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When we look at rolling, we can say that the object (wheel/ball/whatever) is rotating around the point of contact with the floor, P. P is also moving forward with the translational speed of the rolling object. Static friction is what allows P to move forward rather than the object simply spinning in place.
Static friction accelerating an object? When we have a large block on a frictionless floor, and a smaller block on top of it. They are both moving together; static friction has not yet been overcome. We apply a force to the system to accelerate it until we break static friction. The sudden change in frictional force causes the large block to accelerate. But, I don't know whether this counts expressly as static friction accelerating the body.
 
I see...so static friction simply allows for the rotation to occur at point P. That implies that it does not take part in accelerating the object in any direction, right? Although, I heard somewhere that inclined planes are an exception to this; how so?
 
With an inclined plane, you have the same situation, but now you have a gravitational force acting on the wheel, which counteracts the static friction force that facilitates smooth rolling. If the force exceeds the constant static friction point at P, the wheel will slip. But rolling downhill is the same as rolling with a constant applied force. As long as this force does not exceed that of static friction, the wheel will not slip.
 
Alright, thanks
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top