Statics question: when do I need to find the support reactions?

AI Thread Summary
Understanding when to find support reactions in statics is crucial for applying the Method of Joints and Method of Sections effectively. It's generally recommended to calculate support reactions first, as this provides known external forces that simplify the analysis. While zero force members can be ignored in certain cases, having the support reactions aids in accurately determining forces in the structure. Many resources are available online to further clarify these concepts. Overall, solving for support reactions early in the process is beneficial for a clearer and more manageable solution.
denting
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I didn't use the format because my question is more general. I want to be able to understand the logic so I can apply it where appropriate.

We're finding forces (and whether they're in tension or compression) using the Method of Joints and Method of Sections. I don't understand why sometimes it's necessary to find the supprt reactions, but sometimes it's not. Please help. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know in the method of joints there are certain joints that can be ignored called "zero force members" as the name implies. Since the question is so general I'm not sure if this is at all what you are looking for. Theres plenty of reference material on the internet to help you out though I am sure.
 
It is almost always better to solve for the support reactions first before using the method of joints or sections, because it gives you more known external forces up front and makes the solution much easier. Sooner or later you'll need to find them anyway, better sooner than later.
 
I always solve for reactions first as well.

PhanthomJay, I was looking forward to hearing your take on the question.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top