Statics: Shear and bending moment, distributed load

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for shear and bending moment in a static beam under a distributed load using equilibrium equations. The user calculates the reaction at point A and derives expressions for shear force V(x) and bending moment M(x) based on vertical force and moment equilibrium. They confirm that the calculated values of V and M at x = 0 align with their earlier equilibrium calculations. A request for clarification on the derivation of these equations leads to a breakdown of the triangle area formulas used in the calculations. The conversation highlights the static nature of the system and the importance of understanding contributions to bending moments along the beam.
yaro99
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


ks4QbRZ.png

Homework Equations


ƩFy=0
ƩM=0

The Attempt at a Solution



Finding the reaction at A:
NBbavS8.png


ƩFy=0: A + (L*w0)/6 - (L*w0)/2 = 0
A = (L*w0)/3

ƩMA=0: MA - [(L*w0)/2]*(L/3) + [(L*w0)/6]*((2L)/3) = 0
MA = (w0*L2)/18

For the shear and bending moment:
uYe21ky.png


ƩFy=0: (L*w0)/3 - (x*w0)/2 + (x*w0)/6 - V = 0
V = (L*w0)/3 - (x*w0)/3

ƩM=0: (w0*L2)/18 + [(x*w0)/2]*[(2*x)/3] - [(x*w0)/6]*(x/3) + M = 0
M = -(w0*L2)/18 - (5/18)*w0*x2
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What happens to your equations for V(x) and M(x) when x = 0? Would these values of V and M match your statics equilibrium calculations?
 
SteamKing said:
What happens to your equations for V(x) and M(x) when x = 0? Would these values of V and M match your statics equilibrium calculations?

It looks to me like they do:
V = (L*w0)/3 which balances out the force at A (V is pointing down)

M = -(w0*L2)/18 = (w0*L2)/18 clockwise, which balances the equivalent counterclockwise moment at A.
 
yaro99 said:
ƩFy=0: (L*w0)/3 - (x*w0)/2 + (x*w0)/6 - V = 0
V = (L*w0)/3 - (x*w0)/3
x, I assume, is a distance from the wall.
I don't understand how you obtained these equations. Can you spell that out more clearly?
 
haruspex said:
x, I assume, is a distance from the wall.
I don't understand how you obtained these equations. Can you spell that out more clearly?

Yes, that is correct.
I summed up the vertical forces in my diagram.

(L*w0)/3 is the value I obtained for A in the beginning of the problem.
(x*w0)/2 is from the triangle area formula (Bh)/2, where the base is distance x, and w0, the magnitude of the force, is the height
(x*w0)/6 : also using area of a triangle, where the base is again x, and the height is (1/3)*w0 as indicated in the problem.


V = (L*w0)/3 - (x*w0)/3 is what I get when I solve the ƩFy equation for V
 
yaro99 said:
I summed up the vertical forces in my diagram.
I still don't get the reasoning behind it.
Since the system is static, the total moment about any point on the beam is zero. The bending moment at X is the contribution from one side of the point X only. I would expect to see something like ##\int_{y=x}^L (y-x)F(y).dy##. Maybe you have a neat way of avoiding the integration, but if so I'm not seeing it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top