Systems - Girl and Sled - Newton's 3rd Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter chipper22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Girl Law Systems
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mass of a sled being pulled up a slippery slope by a girl, considering Newton's laws of motion. The girl can accelerate the sled without slipping, and the problem involves analyzing the forces acting on both the girl and the sled. Key forces include the gravitational force, friction, and the tension in the rope. By applying Newton's second law to both the girl and the sled, two equations can be derived to find the sled's mass. The analysis emphasizes understanding the forces parallel to the slope and their maximum values to solve for the unknown mass.
chipper22
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A girl of mass m_G is walking up a slippery slope while pulling a sled of unknown mass; the slope makes an angle "theta" with the horizontal. The coefficient of static friction between the girl's boots and the slope is mu_s; the friction between the sled and the slope is negligible. It turns out that the girl can pull the sled up the slope with acceleration up to "a" without slipping down the slope. Find the mass of the sled m_S. Assume that the rope connecting the girl and the sled is kept parallel to the slope at all times.

I am having trouble finding m_S, the mass of the sled. I've drawn a free body diagram of both of the systems.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apply Newton's 2nd law to the entire system (girl + sled).

What forces act parallel to the slope? What force pulls the system up the slope? What's its maximum value? What's the net force?

You can also analyze the forces on the sled and girl separately and apply Newton's 2nd law to each:
What forces act on the sled? What forces act on the girl? What's the maximum value of the force pulling the girl up the slope? You'll end up with 2 equations that you can combine to solve for the mass.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top