The Internal Energy of Neon Gas

AI Thread Summary
The internal energy of neon gas is determined by its total kinetic energy, which can be calculated using the equation U = 3/2nRT. For the given conditions of 2 liters at 200 K and 0.7 atm, the density must be adjusted from standard conditions. The correct approach involves using the relationship U = (3/2)PV, where both pressure and volume are known. The calculations indicate that the internal energy can be derived directly from these parameters, simplifying the process significantly. Understanding that the internal energy of an ideal gas depends solely on pressure and volume is crucial for solving such problems.
PrideofPhilly
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The internal energy of a monoatomic ideal gas such as neon is simply the total kinetic energy of all its atoms.

What is the internal energy of 2 liters of neon at a temperature of 200 K and pressure of 0.7 atm?

Homework Equations



PV = nRT
KE(ave) = 3/2kT
U = 3/2nRT

The Attempt at a Solution



KE = 1/2mv^2

From a previous problem, I figured out that v(rms) = 499.227 m/s.

And, 2 liters of neon X 0.9002 g/L (density of neon) = 0.0018004 kg

KE = 1/2(0.0018004 kg)(499.227 m/s) = 224.3546833 J (wrong answer)

I feel like I am approaching this problem in the wrong manner. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's the density of Ne at STP. What is the density at 200K and .7 atm?
 
So, d = P X MM/RT

d = (0.7 atm)(20 g/mol)/(8.31 J/mol*K)(200 K)
d= 0.008423586

2 L * 0.008423586 = 1.684717208E-5 kg

KE = 1/2(1.68E-5)(499.227 m/s)^2 = 2.09 J (WRONG ANSWER)

AM I USING THE WRONG UNITS OR DID I DO A MATH ERROR?
 
PrideofPhilly said:
So, d = P X MM/RT

d = (0.7 atm)(20 g/mol)/(8.31 J/mol*K)(200 K)
d= 0.008423586

2 L * 0.008423586 = 1.684717208E-5 kg

KE = 1/2(1.68E-5)(499.227 m/s)^2 = 2.09 J (WRONG ANSWER)

AM I USING THE WRONG UNITS OR DID I DO A MATH ERROR?

I'd say your numbers are wrong, because without even looking you had .0018 kg using STP. I wouldn't expect such a small number after accounting for the 200/273 ratio and the .7 ratio.

Won't the approach work out to be more like (P1/T1)/(P2/T2) = d1/d2 ?
 
I may be missing something but it looks from the revelant equations that
U=1.5*(R/M)*T where R is the universal gas constant, M is the molecular weight of neon and T is temperature in deg K. Am I over simplifing this?
 
The solution to the problem is startlingly simple; you were less than a hair away from getting it. You wrote, as a relevant equation, U = 3/2nRT. You also wrote PV = nRT. So if U=(3/2)PV, and you have both P and V.

Remember this neat result: the internal energy of an ideal gas depends only on its pressure and volume.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top