Theoretical frictional force of a mass going down a ramp

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the frictional force of a cart rolling down a 24.4-degree slope using experimental data. The equation of motion is established as ma = mgsin(theta) - Ff, but the challenge lies in calculating the acceleration (a) and the frictional force (Ff) simultaneously. It is suggested that if the cart's distance traveled (s) and time (t) are known, acceleration can be derived from the equation s = (1/2)at^2. However, the theoretical aspect complicates matters since there are two unknowns, requiring additional information or equations to solve. Ultimately, a non-numeric solution can be achieved by rearranging the equation to express either a or Ff in terms of the other.
Marvels
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So, we did a lab wherein we rolled a 1.001kg cart down a 24.4 degree slope. We used a ticker tape timer and are trying to find the frictional force of the ticker tape timer alone.

The problem is, I can't figure out how to find the acceleration for the equation

Homework Equations



ma = mgsin(theta) - Ff

The Attempt at a Solution



1.001(a) - 1.001(-9.81)sin24.4 - Ff

Do I need to use vectors? Is it just -9.8? If vectors, do I calculate it for the x or y plane?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you assume the acceleration a is constant (which is equivalent to assuming that the frictional force Ff is constant) then you calculate ##a## from your experimental data. If the cart traveled s metres down the ramp in time t, starting from a stationary state, then the relevant equation is ##s=\frac{1}{2}at^2##.
 
Sorry, I neglected to mention that this part of my work is supposed to be the theoretical. Does that change much?
 
Well you have only one equation, with two unknowns: a and Ff. A numeric solution can only be obtained if further information is provided. That could be the value of one of those quantities, or it could be another equation, based on additional information about the physical system. For the latter, it might be via a formula that gives Ff in terms of the mass of the cart, g and the angle of the slope. But what such a formula might be will depend on the details of the experiment.

A non-numeric solution can be obtained for either of a or Ff by just making it the subject of the equation. Then you will have an expression for a in terms of Ff, or vice versa.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top