Thermodynamics: Calculating work done in irreversible expansion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the heat, work, and entropy change for the isothermal expansion of 100g of ethane at 350°C, comparing reversible and irreversible processes. The user successfully solved the reversible case, determining work as -5738.79 J and entropy change as 9.209 J/K, with heat calculated as 5738.79 J. For the irreversible expansion, the user is uncertain about the approach, questioning whether to apply the same principles or if the work done is zero due to free expansion. It is noted that additional information, specifically the external pressure, is necessary to accurately solve the irreversible case.
Rocalvic
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose 100g of ethane (C2H6) expands isothermally at 350C from 50ml to 2L. Calculate the heat and work done by the system and the change in entropy if:

i)The process is via a reversible path.
ii)The process is non-reversible.

I don't know how to answer ii)

Homework Equations


w=-nRTln(v2/v1)

The Attempt at a Solution



I have managed to answer i)

Work = -NRTln (v2/v1) = (0.30026)(8.315)(623.15)ln(2/0.050)
Work = -5738.79 J.

Entropy change = nRln (v2/v1) = (0.30026)(8.3145)ln(2/0.050)
Entropy Change = 9.209 J.K

Heat: Q=-w, so Heat = 5738.79.

ii) I am unsure how to answer this question, do I apply the same principle? Or is this a result of free expansion and therefore the work done is 0?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Rocalvic,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

You analyzed part i correctly, and you are also correct to note that there is not enough information provided to solve part ii (except for the change in entropy, of course). To do part ii, you need to know the pressure imposed by the surroundings during the irreversible change.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top