Thermodynamics: PV diagram: High temperature adiabat

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of adiabatic curves on a PV diagram, particularly whether they become steeper at higher temperatures. It is noted that as temperature increases, the degrees of freedom for multi-atom molecules also increase, which can lead to a steeper adiabat. However, it is clarified that the increase in degrees of freedom is limited by geometry and does not necessarily continue indefinitely with temperature. The relationship between pressure and volume is derived from the equations PV=const for isotherms and PVγ=const for adiabats, where γ is dependent on the degrees of freedom. The conversation also touches on the nature of the constants in these equations, questioning whether they differ between isothermal and adiabatic processes.
msavg
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known

Hi, this is my first post on here.

Does an adiabat get steeper at higher temperatures? I think it does, but I wanted to make sure I'm thinking about it in the right way. Also, what is the constant in the PV relations?

Homework Equations



PV=const, for constant temperature.

PVγ=const, for zero heat transfer.

γ=(f+2)/f, where f=degrees of freedom.

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the equations for total thermal energy, the first law, and the ideal gas law, we can derive relationships between pressure and volume that show us what the PV diagram will look like. Since an isotherm comes from
PV=const
and an adiabat comes from
PVγ=const, where γ=(f+2)/f,
we can readily see that the adiabat will be steeper than the isotherm.

However, as temperatue increases, so do the degrees of freedom for a multi-atom molecule. As degrees of freedom increase, so too does the exponent on the V for the adiabatic case. This would lead to a steeper adiabat for non-monatomic molecules at higher temperatures. Furthermore, because the maximum total degrees of freedom possible=3N, where N=number of atoms comprising the molecule, our adiabat would get steeper and steeper for larger and larger molecules at higher temperatures.

Is that correct?

As for the constant, I've looked all over my textbook, but it doesn't describe it at all. Is it some kind of characteristic constant dependent on the kind of gas we're talking about? Are the constants in the isothermal case and adiabatic case the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
msavg said:
Using the equations for total thermal energy, the first law, and the ideal gas law, we can derive relationships between pressure and volume that show us what the PV diagram will look like. Since an isotherm comes from
PV=const
and an adiabat comes from
PVγ=const, where γ=(f+2)/f,
we can readily see that the adiabat will be steeper than the isotherm.
What do you mean by "steeper"? Is this a P-V diagram (P on the vertical axis, V on the horizontal)? What part of the curve are you talking about?
However, as temperature increases, so do the degrees of freedom for a multi-atom molecule.
This is not necessarily true. It depends on the temperature. The number of degrees of freedom are limited by geometry. So when all modes are activated, there is no increase in the number of degrees of freedom with further temperature increases.

Furthermore, because the maximum total degrees of freedom possible=3N, where N=number of atoms comprising the molecule, our adiabat would get steeper and steeper for larger and larger molecules at higher temperatures.

Is that correct?
The adiabatic condition assumes an ideal gas obeying PV=nRT. As you increase the number of atoms in the molecule, the atoms tend to lose their ideal gas behaviour.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top